Money
Well-Known Member
Except for this year
Just like the fact that there are 26 QBs better than Brady this year?
Except for this year
Nothing better than the passion of CFB. Except for March Madness. NFL is great but most NFL fans are bandwagon geoupiesPolitics and college football...
And an Atlanta fan.
3 strikes looking, you are out......
Bat never even left your shoulder.
Nothing better than the passion of CFB. Except for March Madness. NFL is great but most NFL fans are bandwagon geoupies
LOL. It is what it is. Even if I take Freeman first 3vganes out to even stuff up the Atlanta trio still has better numbers vs better opponents ( better opponents by A LOT). No one is debating the greatness of the Steelers trio but you all act like this is the first you've heard of the Atlanta guys. You act like it's inconceivable a top 2 or 3 trio could have a year where they're the best trio. It's preposterous.that's just wrong ....
They're all more highly skilled than us Hank lol
LOL. It is what it is.
I don't care how many people want to be stupid. Numbers are numbers, facts are facts. Anyone taking Pitts trio THIS year isn't using either of those 2 things. It's like this. John Elway is widely considered to be a greater QB than Dan Marino right?? Does that mean EVERY YEAR Elway had was better than Marinos year?? Of course not. You guys apparently don't understand that teams, players, trios can have years where they are better and years where they're worse. It's cool. No skin off my back.Exactly how many people do you need to tell you that it actually isn't what you say it is???
"LOL"
I don't care how many people want to be stupid. Numbers are numbers, facts are facts. Anyone taking Pitts trio THIS year isn't using either of those 2 things. It's like this. John Elway is widely considered to be a greater QB than Dan Marino right?? Does that mean EVERY YEAR Elway had was better than Marinos year?? Of course not. You guys apparently don't understand that teams, players, trios can have years where they are better and years where they're worse. It's cool. No skin off my back.
My comment was solely directed to this year though. I've never claimed otherwise. In fact I've stated that the Pitt trio is the best overall.... just not this year. So unless you disagree with that then why are we debating still??You didn't actually read the article this thread was based on...did you? Let me clue you in...it's not titled "List of what trios will have the better stats this year".
I suggest in the future you simply create your own thread instead of hijacking another and attempting to make it fit your agenda.
My comment was solely directed to this year though. I've never claimed otherwise. In fact I've stated that the Pitt trio is the best overall.... just not this year. So unless you disagree with that then why are we debating still??
It's not just about numbers Money. It's about results. Atlanta has a better record vs a better schedule. I am struggling to see how this is tough to get. Really it's ok if someone other than the Pitt trio is having the best year. It doesn't besmirch their talent, it just says some other guys are really good too.No...they are still the best. They just aren't putting up the best numbers as a trio based on several factors. As I stated before...there aren't 26 better QBs than Brady this year.
It's not just about numbers Money. It's about results. Atlanta has a better record vs a better schedule. I am struggling to see how this is tough to get. Really it's ok if someone other than the Pitt trio is having the best year. It doesn't besmirch their talent, it just says some other guys are really good too.
what happened to bens missed games?LOL. It is what it is. Even if I take Freeman first 3vganes out to even stuff up the Atlanta trio still has better numbers vs better opponents ( better opponents by A LOT). No one is debating the greatness of the Steelers trio but you all act like this is the first you've heard of the Atlanta guys. You act like it's inconceivable a top 2 or 3 trio could have a year where they're the best trio. It's preposterous.
ok so 2 games of bens passing, plus 3 games bell receiving and rushing? can't be 900?Sure add that in too. Doesn't make up 900+ yards. And it certainly doesn't counter the huge difference in schedules and results
Ben missed one game not 2. Julio played 1 series vs New Orleans and Freeman has missed parts of 2 games but I'm still counting those games. Ben would've had to pass for 500 yards in the game he missed just to make the numbers even vs worse teams. PITT has 3vwins vs teams with worse records than ANYONE Atlanta has even played. Plus being healthy is part of having an elite year. Bell and Ben haven't been all year. The fact they're still having great years points to how awesome they are. That's why they're the best overall. Just not THIS yearok so 2 games of bens passing, plus 3 games bell receiving and rushing? can't be 900?
if ben only passes for 250 a game that's 500....
bell averages what off the top of my head 120-130-140 yards a game? receiving and rushing...... surely could be 900 easy....... and i would assume more than three . touchdowns....... to assume that's not doable is asinine
Yep I realize. I'm also counting Freemans receiving yards twice. Thus year it's not close. Overall there are certainly arguments to be made for others but not this year
Dallas has a good young Corp and they may have an argument in the future if Dak and Zeke keep balling but Dez is having a shit year so no Dallas isn't close THIS year. Could be different in the future. Probably will bewell if it isn't close then Dallas must be winning with our defense, which Atlanta must have none.