- Thread starter
- #3,421
winning changes everything.
Owners need to cough up some funds
Not really, cheapskate owners should pay. If Kroenke can build that great LA stadium without tax payers and still pay crybaby St.Louis a shit ton of money, than the others can. If they can't, sell the team.winning changes everything.
its been a half a season of good football.
mahomes is tough as hell to stop.
What also helps Warner is he never made the playoffs when he wasn't at his best.That kind of speaks volumes to how good Warner was. The first part of his career was not during the current rules and all the others except early Brady were in current rules. If you don't think it makes a difference you're either very young or probably don't know what you're saying.
he was awful in ny 2 or 3 years.What also helps Warner is he never made the playoffs when he wasn't at his best.
Super Bowl Champion Crybaby St Louis Rams.Not really, cheapskate owners should pay. If Kroenke can build that great LA stadium without tax payers and still pay crybaby St.Louis a shit ton of money, than the others can. If they can't, sell the team.
What also helps Warner is he never made the playoffs when he wasn't at his best.
Super Bowl Champion Crybaby St Louis Rams.
But yes, if you have NY, LA, Houston or Chicago markets then the owner should 100% pay for it because those markets are massive
If the team ends up in Kansas, I get it. Its easier to sell a new stadium than to upgrade an older one.Glaring omission of Kansas City; where do you stand on those stadium talks?