Clayton
Well-Known Member
The team that lost the RG3 trade was the Browns
Yeah, no one is arguing they got a great deal. I'm just saying there isn't any proof of a huge one sided advantage that a few, including yourself are saying. We just went 10-6 and have a franchise QB. The rams are in total disarray, in one of the toughest divisions. The Rams did indeed finish better than us BUT still were under .500. Thats not good.
And who knows if Sam Bradford will still be there in a couple years. He can't stay healthy or go 10-6 and host playoff games.
IF RGIII regains his health and confidence AND if Sam Bradford can gel with his new offensive weapons then it will simply be a deal. (not ideal, but a deal)
WAS may be one year removed from hosting a playoff game, but they are also two months removed from a 3-13 season (in one of the worst divisions in football) that saw their "franchise" QB get benched for the last 3 games of the season. The Rams had to suffer through using a backup QB for most of the season, in a very good division and still did better than WAS. When they get to add two more top 15 picks, it will be pretty obvious to see that they indeed are getting the better end of the deal.
This thread doesn't make any sense? We all know the Rams got a bunch of picks, what is your point?
We are just one year removed from hosting a playoff game, while the rams(no offense) are going to be stuck at the bottom of a tough division for a few years. How are they clear cut winners in the deal?
Also your theories don't make sense. You say the 2013 NFL pro-bowl ROY QB is a bust after just two years?
C'mon man, I could clown Russell Wilson for not winning the Superbowl MVP but that would be pure hating.
Which is how this thread is coming across
The redskins would have been worse without a QB and would still need one badly.
The redskins would have been worse without a QB and would still need one badly.
Yes, worse than 3-13, and worse than a playoff berth last year as well. RG3 will make it blatantly obvious he was worth it in another year or two. Any extended success absolutely requires top of the line QB play, and Griffin has more talent than anyone else in the league.
And to get top of the line QB play, it takes time. Either by building a team around him or by development. And if you're going to build it while he's developing, he better be damn tough. Putting the cart before the horse is dangerous, going all in to do so is crazy.
But there is no way to know that they would have been a worse team this last year. Especially if they got some good young players with those draft picks they gave up and had a QB on two good legs.
And to get top of the line QB play, it takes time. Either by building a team around him or by development. And if you're going to build it while he's developing, he better be damn tough. Putting the cart before the horse is dangerous, going all in to do so is crazy.
But there is no way to know that they would have been a worse team this last year. Especially if they got some good young players with those draft picks they gave up and started a QB on two good legs all year.
And to get top of the line QB play, it takes time. Either by building a team around him or by development. And if you're going to build it while he's developing, he better be damn tough. Putting the cart before the horse is dangerous, going all in to do so is crazy.
But there is no way to know that they would have been a worse team this last year. Especially if they got some good young players with those draft picks they gave up and started a QB on two good legs all year.
And to get top of the line QB play, it takes time. Either by building a team around him or by development. And if you're going to build it while he's developing, he better be damn tough. Putting the cart before the horse is dangerous, going all in to do so is crazy.
But there is no way to know that they would have been a worse team this last year. Especially if they got some good young players with those draft picks they gave up and started a QB on two good legs all year.
There will not be a talent close to RG3's level to come out in the next few years. He was not worth passing up.
I think the guy has talent no question... But I thought the Redskins gave up way to much... He had a good 1st year but relied on his legs more than anything... He's gonna have to develop his game as a thrower and not so much a runner... Especially now after his injury... Qb's are a hit and miss and so many don't pan out so I think it's way to risky giving up so much....
Worse than 3-13?
Maybe they are better, maybe not. But you cant get much worse than 3-13. If they had not traded everything to pick him, perhaps they find a QB that wasn't as touted as RG3 but used the picks well to take pressure off of him. Maybe you still need a QB, but at least you're looking for one with other pieces in place rather than be in a rush to find all the other pieces to take pressure off your QB before he breaks.
I think the guy has talent no question... But I thought the Redskins gave up way to much... He had a good 1st year but relied on his legs more than anything... He's gonna have to develop his game as a thrower and not so much a runner... Especially now after his injury... Qb's are a hit and miss and so many don't pan out so I think it's way to risky giving up so much....