- Thread starter
- #1
YourFriendGannon
Well-Known Member
Butler was suspended for 7 games by the team at the start of 2025 and then 7 more games later on before being traded. It seems to me that usually in these kinds of situations where a player wishes to be traded by a team and can't coexist, the player and team will mutually agree for the player to not participate with the team until something is worked out.
Why was suspension the course of action here and have there been precedents for extended suspensions of this variety, especially in the modern NBA? I feel like I'm missing something obvious. Like did Butler essentially consent to being suspended or something? Are teams required to always pay a player unless they suspend him, is that relevant here?
Why was suspension the course of action here and have there been precedents for extended suspensions of this variety, especially in the modern NBA? I feel like I'm missing something obvious. Like did Butler essentially consent to being suspended or something? Are teams required to always pay a player unless they suspend him, is that relevant here?