TROJAN-MAN
Been around the block more times than the mailman
Big USC fan!
1. Florida State (14-0)
2. Michigan State (13-1)
3. Oklahoma (11-2)
4. Auburn (12-2)
5. South Carolina (11-2)
6. Alabama (11-2)
7. Clemson (11-2)
8. Missouri (12-2)
9. UCF (12-1)
10. Ohio State (12-2)
11. Stanford (11-3)
12. Oregon (11-2)
13. Baylor (11-2)
14. UCLA (10-3)
15. LSU (10-3)
16. Arizona State (10-4)
17. Wisconsin (9-4)
18. Texas A&M (9-4)
19. Notre Dame (9-4)
20. USC (9-4)
21. Duke (9-4)
22. Nebraska (9-4)
23. Vanderbilt (9-4)
24. Washington (9-4)
25. Fresno State (11-2)
Btw, Michigan St beat an Ohio St that really don't play any good teams until it played Michigan St. Ohio St went on to lose to Clemson, a team South Carolina beat much more convincingly.
South Carolina did lose to Tennessee and Georgia(who Clemson beat) during the year. However, South Carolina also beat Missouri a top5 team by most peoples rankings, as well as the UCF team that most people have ranking in the top10 and just beat Baylor in a bowl game. UCF's only loss on the year.
I rank South Carolina with a top10 SoS this year, worlds ahead of Michigan St.
You beat a Stanford team who lost 2 games during the year, one of which was to USC and the other to Utah.
So, cry more. I have no interest coddling to teams who play weak schedules, not even my own team.
So how do you rank mizzou so high? They didnt play bama, LSU....and lost to SC and auburn....i think stanford is better than oklahoma st.....sparty also beat nebraska, who beat georgia...but funny you have mizzou ahead of MSU....mizzou beat nobody.....
So how do you rank mizzou so high? They didnt play bama, LSU....and lost to SC and auburn....i think stanford is better than oklahoma st.....sparty also beat nebraska, who beat georgia...but funny you have mizzou ahead of MSU....mizzou beat nobody.....
I guess we have a difference of opinion on who "nobody" is.
Because I see a Missouri that didn't play any bottom of the barrel teams outside Kentucky and Murray St.
Yet they beat:
Vandy(9-4)
Georgia(8-5)
Ole Miss(8-5)
Texas A&M(9-4)
Oklahoma St(10-3)
Arkansas St(8-5)
Then they played South Carolina and Auburn, who are both top5 teams or close to it by most people standards, leaving 8 out of 13 games vs bowl teams.
Overall I rank them as having the 13th toughest schedule.
So beating 5 loss SEC teams are quality wins but 4 or 5 loss Big ten teams are not. And seriously, a 5 loss sunbelt team is a quality win??? Get the hell out of here with that bullshit. You're SEC homerism is showing.
I just listed the teams that went to bowl games this year. Hense why I said 8 of their 13 games were against bowl teams. But really, it should be 14.
And yes, 8-5 SEC teams are generally better than 8-5 Big10 teams. Because of issue is who the losses are too. It's not because "SEC", as my formula doesn't use conferences in any manner, it's just generally tougher teams being played and who those loses come to. Obviously you agree with this philosophy because you mentioned "a 5 loss sunbelt team" as being insignificant, you just don't want to face the reality of the Big10.
Are you equally upset that Alabama is ranked #12? Is that my bias showing as well, or is it a reflection of performance and schedule?
Oh the Big10 sucks ass. I won't argue that but iwouldn't be pimping up a 5 loss MAC team like you are trying to pawn off a 5 loss sunbelt team as some awesome win.
And of Michigan State's 14 games, 7 were against bowl teams. But yeah, you are soon un biased because you have Alabama at 12 but I think you need to figure out a way to squeeze more SEC teams into the rankings. You and Sakau must share a bed because you shovel out the same shit. Let me guess Kentucky would dominate every other conference with a MoV of 80+ points. FSU is lucky that Arkansas wasn't in the ACCorelse they never would have made the title game with a 127 to -14 loss on their record.
You are acting this way because I have Michigan St 6th? And listing bowl teams, while even calling them bowl teams, is somehow me saying it's an awesome win?
And then you go off into lala land.
![]()
So posting completely ignorant and ridiculous things is ok for you? Got it.
Missouri and southcarolina beat no one and they deserve to be top 5 and UCF, really? But Michigan State has better wins than Missouri and USC combined.
1. Florida St
2. South Carolina
3. Auburn
4. Missouri
5. UCF
6. Michigan St
7. Stanford
8. Ohio St
9. Oklahoma
10. Clemson
11. Baylor
12. Alabama
13. Louisville
14. LSU
15. Arizona St
16. UCLA
17. Oklahoma St
18. Oregon
19. Texas A&M
20. Notre Dame
21. Georgia
22. Washington
23. Southern California
24. Wisconsin
25. Duke
I wouldn't dispute that much. But isn't a 9-4 B1G team better than an 8-5 SEC team that they beat head to head?I just listed the teams that went to bowl games this year. Hense why I said 8 of their 13 games were against bowl teams. But really, it should be 14.
And yes, 8-5 SEC teams are generally better than 8-5 Big10 teams. Because of issue is who the losses are too. It's not because "SEC", as my formula doesn't use conferences in any manner, it's just generally tougher teams being played and who those loses come to. Obviously you agree with this philosophy because you mentioned "a 5 loss sunbelt team" as being insignificant, you just don't want to face the reality of the Big10.
Are you equally upset that Alabama is ranked #12? Is that my bias showing as well, or is it a reflection of performance and schedule?
So posting completely ignorant and ridiculous things is only ok for you? Got it.
Missouri and southcarolina beat no one and they deserve to be top 5 and UCF, really? But Michigan State has better wins than Missouri and USC combined.
Rank Team
1 FSU
2 Auburn
3 Michigan State
4 UCF
5 Missouri
6 South Carolina
7 Clemson
8 Oklahoma
9 Stanford
10 Oregon
11 Alabama
12 Baylor
13 Ohio State
14 Louisville
15 LSU
16 UCLA
17 Oklahoma State
18 Duke
19 Texas A&M
20 Arizona State
21 USC
22 Washington
23 Wisconsin
24 Notre Dame
25 Nebraska
1. Florida State
2. Michigan State
3. Auburn
4. South Carolina
5. Oklahoma
6. Clemson
7. Stanford
8. Oregon
9. Missouri
10. Ohio State
11. Alabama
12. UCF
13. Baylor
14. UCLA
15. Oklahoma State
16. USC
17. Wisconsin
18. Texas A&M
19. Duke
20 LSU
21. Nebraska
22. Arizona State
23. Washington
24. Notre Dame
25. North Dakota State
I wouldn't dispute that much. But isn't a 9-4 B1G team better than an 8-5 SEC team that they beat head to head?
Signed,
Biased Husker