- Thread starter
- #521
Hey, hey, hey….Dagger?
It depends on how they shoot. But that means they get to 6 before going down.
What'd I miss?Hey, hey, hey….
We don’t use those terms anymore in concert with the word Bull.
Thought you’d be more enlightened.
That is being generous
Bucks in 4
I was assuming a great shooting night for their one win. A sweep is very possible...Heat are not good at scoring.It depends on how they shoot. But that means they get to 6 before going down.
It's a little Montalban-like though. He always predicted his teams to lose so he could be 'happy he was wrong'Bucks in 4
My jinx worked. Bet the bulls on the spread because anytime i bet on miami they would lose
Just supporting my guy bksThat is being generous
They will really miss Tucker. They are going to have to use Bam on Giannis I guess?I was assuming a great shooting night for their one win. A sweep is very possible...Heat are not good at scoring.
That’s ridiculous. The league should have stopped it earlier though.
It's a little Montalban-like though. He always predicted his teams to lose so he could be 'happy he was wrong'