Broncosr0k
Well-Known Member
I claimed that prior to the game, the Broncs were the top team. TDs argued that point:
Not true, at all. Broncos haven't played consistently well all year.
Thus, the reference to power rankings. TDs is incorrect; Broncos were the top team in the league 'till the Pats smacked 'em down. Pats got smacked down in Kansas City. The difference is that the Pats have bounced back while the Broncs are still trying to right the ship.
1) Power rankings are pure media BS used to drum up clicks and views. They never even follow their own logic so using them to prove the broncos were the top team is questionable.
B) Pats were floundering going into Arrowhead. That whoopin' was a wake up call. Don't act like the pats struggling against the chiefs was a one-off type while the broncos have been in a funk for weeks.
To be honest, the broncos had their issues that no pats fan wants to discuss. They nearly lost to the colts and chiefs at home to start the season, it took 3 quarters to get it going against the seahawks, and they rocked an already injured cardinals team. They handled the 49ers but that is not as impressive as it would have been last year.
The broncos were never as strong as the media built them up to be. They also have been struggling recently. Part of that is the inconsistency of the team that has been around all season. Some of that could be getting blown up by the pats. I don't think any objective person can argue that the pats are solely responsible for the broncos recent struggles.