megalodon30
Archduke of Crosstown Busses
The value chart is going to kill some interest but I would not be surprised if DEN moved up
Read on Walterfootball that teams in the 20s have already received calls from the Broncos.
The value chart is going to kill some interest but I would not be surprised if DEN moved up
The physically most gifted QB may go 3rd in his own position group, while one of less physically gifted likely goes first. Go figure. Shows how much it's a mental game.
Read on Walterfootball that teams in the 20s have already received calls from the Broncos.
Exactly what I implied by Goff going 1st overall over Lynch who may or may not even make the 1st round.It doesn't matter how great a QB's arm is. What matters is how accurate they are passing the football.
Exactly what I implied by Goff going 1st overall over Lynch who may or may not even make the 1st round.
It doesn't matter how great a QB's arm is. What matters is how accurate they are passing the football.
Talent isn't the same really, but... yeah.Kellen Moore 69.8% completion percentage at Boise St.
Paxton Lynch 62.9% at Memphis.
Whelp, I guess Lynch is gonna be worse than Moore.
Kellen Moore 69.8% completion percentage at Boise St.
Paxton Lynch 62.9% at Memphis.
Whelp, I guess Lynch is gonna be worse than Moore.
Completion percentage & accuracy aren't the same thing.
No, but % is a pretty good measure for accuracy. How else do you know a guy can put the ball where he wants if not by looking at his completion %? Sure, there are dink and dunk guys that have artificially inflated percentages, but those guys either end up backups/game managers or out of the league pretty quickly.
Peyton Manning 62.5% at TennesseeKellen Moore 69.8% completion percentage at Boise St.
Paxton Lynch 62.9% at Memphis.
Whelp, I guess Lynch is gonna be worse than Moore.
Peyton Manning 62.5% at Tennessee
Tim Tebow 66.4% at Florida.
And we all know that Tebow is a more accurate passer than Manning.
The value chart is going to kill some interest but I would not be surprised if DEN moved up
I'm going to disagree with this because arguably the main reason Lynch is a lesser prospect is because he is less ready. A team like the Rams 100% needed a day 1 QB. Wentz will probably start in the first half of his first year and possibly day 1. Browns can flirt with the notion that RG3, a QB with higher upside than any QB in this draft, can theoretically be a QB. Meanwhile, they can teach Lynch the game and have him sit for a year or however long it takes RG3 to get injured.Doesn't make sense for the Browns to take Lynch there at 8. They could have taken a better QB at 2 but opted out of it.
It would be nonsensical to then use your early first rounder on an even lesser QB at 8 when there are solid skill position players needed and available.
And traditionally Andy Reid. A few mocks have the Chiefs taking Lynch in rd1 and Id be kinda shocked if they didn't given that the Chiefs drafting weights positional value very highly in rd1.All things the Broncos look for.
And traditionally Andy Reid. A few mocks have the Chiefs taking Lynch in rd1 and Id be kinda shocked if they didn't given that the Chiefs drafting weights positional value very highly in rd1.