- Thread starter
- #1
They're all on the IR
Pro Bowl voting allows you to cast as many ballots as you choose. They're both a cross between bad analysis and a popularity contest.
That said, they're both considered among the highest honors players can achieve and they more or less align with quality players. It's not ridiculous to talk about how many all pro players you've drafted, for example.
(Fivehead is the only All Pro because there's no case to be made that anyone else was the best QB this year. You're supposed to vote for the player you feel was the best at the position. McCourty being an alternate means at least one of the voters believed he was the best free safety in the NFL this year. Nobody was willing to say there was a better QB than Fivehead this year - probably rightly so)
He's a 3-4 DE. Calling that a DT is dumb IMO, but some do, some don't. I think voting him at either spot is perfectly legitimate and not a result of lack of knowledge, just a disagreement on classification.
Couldn't find any info on who voted for McCourty, though the snubs lists I saw were making a case that he either should have been first team or was a big play or two away from being all pro (apparently the guy who did make it - Eric Berry - faded really fast in the 2nd half of the season). I won't pretend to have watched Berry enough to have any idea if that's true, but of course I'm inclined to believe it because it fits the narrative that I've believed all season about McCourty, so I have my own confirmation bias being triggered.
Interesting. So if Curran believed McCourty wasn't quite good enough and Berry was the best, that means McCourty was probably really the best, right?