PAC 12 Thread v6.0

[trojanfan12]

Can we get the Minnesota talk out of the PAC 12 thread. Next thing you know we will be talking about Rutgers

Rutgers would be more interesting.

 

[fredsdeadfriend]

Rutgers would be more interesting.

They'd fit in better in the pathetic PAC.

 

[fredsdeadfriend]

lol

You should be embarrassed.

I'm a little embarrassed for USC.

 

[RegentDenali]

Well it's officially hate week. Let's light this candle.

 

[trojanfan12]

I'm a little embarrassed for USC.

That's because you're too stupid to know you should have been embarrassed by that post. But then, I've seen your posts in several places on here and stupid is kinda your jam.

 

[trojanfan12]

Well it's officially hate week. Let's light this candle.

Go Huskies.

 

[fredsdeadfriend]

That's because you're too stupid to know you should have been embarrassed by that post. But then, I've seen your posts in several places on here and stupid is kinda your jam.

What's embarrassing about the FACT that the conference my team plays in is FAR SUPERIOR to the PAC and has been for several years, yet my team, despite playing in a tougher conference, seems to win just as much as yours?

 

[michaeljordan_fan]

What's embarrassing about the FACT that the conference my team plays in is FAR SUPERIOR to the PAC and has been for several years, yet my team, despite playing in a tougher conference, seems to win just as much as yours?

Your team plays in one of, if not the weakest P5 divisions.

 

[michaeljordan_fan]

It's nice that FDF gave up on trying to show that Minnesota was a comparable job to Oregon.

It was a laughable suggestion considering how garbage Minnesota is, but I thought he might at least provide us a laugh by trying.

 

[TheLonestarDUCK]

Ok Fred here ya go. Head to results between conferences by decade. Since you love to talk about 1960 let’s start there. This is Big 10 vs the PAC:
1960’s = 40-41
1970’s = 40-46
1980’s = 27-40
1990’s = 27-29
2000’s = 21-32
2010’s = 30-33
So far this decade the B1G has an advantage 3-1 we will see how this decade turns out. For someone to be blasting against a conference that your conference hasn’t had a successful decade in over 60 years proves once again you are very much just a casual fan.

 

[trojanfan12]

The USC coaching search is over.

Just announced on The Dan Patrick Show by USC Insider Will Ferrell that Nick Saban or Nick Saban's brother will be the next USC coach.

He couldn't remember which one though.

 

[fredsdeadfriend]

Ok Fred here ya go. Head to results between conferences by decade. Since you love to talk about 1960 let’s start there. This is Big 10 vs the PAC:
1960’s = 40-41
1970’s = 40-46
1980’s = 27-40
1990’s = 27-29
2000’s = 21-32
2010’s = 30-33
So far this decade the B1G has an advantage 3-1 we will see how this decade turns out. For someone to be blasting against a conference that your conference hasn’t had a successful decade in over 60 years proves once again you are very much just a casual fan.

Dude, I did say "recently", and walked it back to 2015, when the B1G started whooping the Pac's arse in the AP polls.

The PAC is trending DOWN, and the B1G is trending UP. And 3 of those decades are hardly conclusive, 40-41, 27-29, 30-33? I'm sure you started in 1960 because the 50s and 40s and 30s and 20s, etc., favored the B1G?

But if you insist that head to head records is the way to go?


3-1 UMn vs Oregon.
4-1 UMn vs Oregon St. So 7-2 vs Team's Nike?

Case closed I guess.

 

[wazzu31]

What's embarrassing about the FACT that the conference my team plays in is FAR SUPERIOR to the PAC and has been for several years, yet my team, despite playing in a tougher conference, seems to win just as much as yours?

You mean Ohio State has been better than Oregon. You can’t say the B1G is a much better conference, both have had 1 team in the NCG and have only had two schools get into the playoff.

No idea why you bring Minnesota up in a conversation about SC. Literally no one would choose to be Minnesota’s coach over SC. SC could probably come in and offer the job to Fleck and ask for a pay decrease and he would jump all over it.

 

[michaeljordan_fan]

You mean Ohio State has been better than Oregon. You can’t say the B1G is a much better conference, both have had 1 team in the NCG and have only had two schools get into the playoff.

No idea why you bring Minnesota up in a conversation about SC. Literally no one would choose to be Minnesota’s coach over SC. SC could probably come in and offer the job to Fleck and ask for a pay decrease and he would jump all over it.

Accurate. I'm sure Fleck is desperate to GTFO of Minnesota. The only question is if a bigname program will take a chance on him while he has the stink of Minnesota on him.

 

[RegentDenali]

The USC coaching search is over.

Just announced on The Dan Patrick Show by USC Insider Will Ferrell that Nick Saban or Nick Saban's brother will be the next USC coach.

He couldn't remember which one though.

Word on the street is its down to Mike Leach or Ty Willingham.

 

[fredsdeadfriend]

You mean Ohio State has been better than Oregon. You can’t say the B1G is a much better conference, both have had 1 team in the NCG and have only had two schools get into the playoff.

No, that is NOT what I am saying.

The difference is far more than one team, it's SO drastic, the B1G has produced more Top Tens than the PAC has produced Top 25s.

Take OSU out of the picture and the B1G(minus OSU) STILL produced AT LEAST TWICE AS MANY Top Ten ranked teams as the PAC(incl Oregon) from 2015-present. That's a 7 year period, the B1G produced 19 Top Ten teams in those 7 years, compared to just 6 for the PAC. So if I assume OSU made Top Ten each of those 7 years, and subtract those 7, that still leaves the B1G with 12 Top Ten ranked teams compared to just 6 for the PAC. lol


Heck, take out the entire B1G East, and just the B1G West has produced 5 Top Ten teams, just one shy of matching the ENTIRE PAC combined.

The B1G West, whom MJ fan "claims" is the worst division, can almost match the PAC's Top 25 production the last 7 years, too, having produced 14 to the PAC's 17.

 

[TheLonestarDUCK]

Dude, I did say "recently", and walked it back to 2015, when the B1G started whooping the Pac's arse in the AP polls.

The PAC is trending DOWN, and the B1G is trending UP. And 3 of those decades are hardly conclusive, 40-41, 27-29, 30-33? I'm sure you started in 1960 because the 50s and 40s and 30s and 20s, etc., favored the B1G?

But if you insist that head to head records is the way to go?


3-1 UMn vs Oregon.
4-1 UMn vs Oregon St. So 7-2 vs Team's Nike?

Case closed I guess.

Lol - now you want to say recently when all of your rhetoric has been from 60-100 years ago. Damn you are all over the place.

 

[michaeljordan_fan]

Ok Fred here ya go. Head to results between conferences by decade. Since you love to talk about 1960 let’s start there. This is Big 10 vs the PAC:
1960’s = 40-41
1970’s = 40-46
1980’s = 27-40
1990’s = 27-29
2000’s = 21-32
2010’s = 30-33
So far this decade the B1G has an advantage 3-1 we will see how this decade turns out. For someone to be blasting against a conference that your conference hasn’t had a successful decade in over 60 years proves once again you are very much just a casual fan.

So you're saying it's been 60+ years since the B1G had a winning decade since the PAC.

Seems about right.

 

[fredsdeadfriend]

Accurate. I'm sure Fleck is desperate to GTFO of Minnesota. The only question is if a bigname program will take a chance on him while he has the stink of Minnesota on him.

If UMn loses Fleck, we could just hire out Offensive Coordinator, that's what Oregon always did, lol. Chump School.

Oh, wait, Oregon stopped hiring chump coordinators, when they hired Taggart, but lost him to FSU after just one year? lol And now they hired some guy with ONE Head Coaching job, where he led FIU to a glorious 27-47 record? WOW!!!

Yeah, we're supposed to believe Oregon is this top coaching job when with all of Uncle Phil's blood money to spend, they went with chump coordinators, or a loser coach, or a guy they couldn't keep more than a year?

 

[fredsdeadfriend]

So you're saying it's been 60+ years since the B1G had a winning decade since the PAC.

Seems about right.

Seems UMn's success is crucial to the B1G's success.