OT - Suh is dirty

[kramer1]

Do Huskers fans have a bat signal that goes out if Suh's name is mentioned? I have no idea what goes on other boards here....nor do I give a shit.

 

[Cincyfan78]

There is also a difference between dilivering big hits legally, and hitting guys late, and ripping their helmets off. I love the way Suh plays, so don't get me wrong...but he's boardering on that fine line between great player and dirty player.

Much like Harrison a few years ago...

 

[Servo]

Suh is awesome...one of my favorite players. He could have taken a diarreah dump on Ryan as he was lying on the ground and I'd still think he's the man.

 

[Ballboy534]

I'm not telling that man-child to stfu... he may go tribal and eat my family...

 

[Servo]

If you could pluck one player from the Lions roster would you take Suh or Megatron? I'd take Suh. The guy is the best D-lineman I've seen in a long time.

 

[flamingrey]

You don't say...

Go Texans!

 

[flamingrey]

If you could pluck one player from the Lions roster would you take Suh or Megatron? I'd take Suh. The guy is the best D-lineman I've seen in a long time.

That's not even a question. There are many many d-lineman I'd take before any WR. They've had Calvin for 4 years now but have always sucked (including being bottom 15 in offense). They get Suh and go for 32nd in defense 3 years in a row to 19th in his rookie season. Receivers are too dependent no other factors. D-Lineman like QBs can change an entire team by themselves.

 

[Cincyfan78]

If you are talking long-term starting a team...I go with Suh.

If you are talking about this year's Bengals team...I'd probably take Johnson. Just because it would propel the offense into another tier. The defense is already good. So, for this year...this team...CJ, but only because our defense has been stellar. Normally, I would agree and go with the DL. You build your teams from the inside out.

 

[TrinDaddy]

I don't care how "dirty" this guy is. He's the type of player I want on the Bengals defense- Hated and feared. There are only a few guys in the league this way - James Harrison, Ray Lewis in his prime, etc. If you're afraid of what a guy might do to you then your game is already off.

 

[Servo]

That's not even a question. There are many many d-lineman I'd take before any WR. They've had Calvin for 4 years now but have always sucked (including being bottom 15 in offense). They get Suh and go for 32nd in defense 3 years in a row to 19th in his rookie season. Receivers are too dependent no other factors. D-Lineman like QBs can change an entire team by themselves.

Not a question for you...I bet if there was a wide poll though most fans would go with CJ.

 

[cincygrad]

Suh without question.

 

[flamingrey]

Not a question for you...I bet if there was a wide poll though most fans would go with CJ.

Um DUH!

Where did you see me write, "Speaking for the world..."?

Besides the point, but I doubt most fans would pick CJ.

 

[flamingrey]

Suh without question.

"Not a question for you..."

 

[corn train]

yeah super dirty

 

[bengaldoug]

He needs to hurry up and get in more trouble....then he could come here as a last resort to revive his career.......

 

[DanBengalfan]

remember when we drafted "big duddy" wilkinson. Suh was a great player in college, because he was a great player and tremendous athelete, not because he was a fat tub of lard DT that looked good against collegiate scrubs. If a player like Suh was available at your pick, you take him, but he's a special breed. Not every team that takes a DT in the top 10 picks is going to see an immediate improvement on defense, because players like Suh are obvious once in a decade kind of talents.

 

[Servo]

Um DUH!

Where did you see me write, "Speaking for the world..."?

Besides the point, but I doubt most fans would pick CJ.

You said 'That's not even a question' hence that it may not be a question for you to take Suh but that I'm sure there are others that would disagree (me not being one of them). No reason to act like a jergoff.

 

[kramer1]

Rey a jerkoff? Never!

 

[flamingrey]

You said 'That's not even a question' hence that it may not be a question for you to take Suh but that I'm sure there are others that would disagree (me not being one of them). No reason to act like a jergoff.

The suggestion was obvious that it wasn't a question for me. It was added as a measure of how I strongly feel that way (same as grad). Your response was unnecessary and added nothing. You took it as a slight to your question, but you were wrong.

 

[Servo]

The suggestion was obvious that it wasn't a question for me. It was added as a measure of how I strongly feel that way (same as grad). Your response was unnecessary and added nothing. You took it as a slight to your question, but you were wrong.

Are we really going to talk about responses that didn't add anything? Just curious what did your response to Grad add? or the response above? The original Suh v. CJ question still stands...so far nobody would be in favor of CJ. I get it.