sayheykid1
New Member
you've traded away most of your 2012 draft and now your 2013 1st rounder, that isn't mortgaging the future? it will be if this team is only good enough to make the play-offs, but lose round 1?
i would agree with you if the Raiders were a legit SB contender, cause its like adding a top FA to fill the final piece(s). but since you're only going so far as saying 'just to make the play-offs', you're implying they're not SB contenders.
so you lose two years in a row cause your TEAM wasn't good enough, then in 2013 you haven't added a 1st round prospect last two years? you haven't even added a 2nd and 3rd from 2012?
BUT, you got Seymour, Palmer, and Pryor.........are you on the upswing or downswing? is that message you sent to fans now still good enough in 2013?
The Raiders traded most likely a lower first round pick and a a first or second rounder. That isn't mortgaging the future. Any playoff team should be a SB contender and choosing to not make the playoffs to have the opportunity to pick Balmer, Harris or Carter isn't going to sweat me that much. Teams that have a long history of suck need to show fans that they can make the playoffs. A team like the 49ers and Raiders should never expect fans to come out and see a rebuilding team when they have failed in every one of their rebuild attempts over the past decade.
The Raiders are going to get some compensatory picks, no?