Vadered
Future Flyer Cup-Winner
Here you go DS, now figure out what I'm looking at.
The first chart says the lower your cost per win, the more wins you have.
The second chart says the more you spend, the more wins you have.
This is actually not a contradiction. A lower cost per win doesn't (necessarily) mean you spend less; it simply means you spend your money more efficiently. Say I went out and spent $1,000 to buy some decent hockey equipment and Pavel Datsyuk spends $2,000 on his own hockey equipment, and then we play each other one on one five times. Pavel wins the first four and I win the last one (because he felt bad for me).
My cost per win is $1,000 / 1 win = $1000/win.
Datsyuk's cost per win is $2,000 / 4 wins = $500/win.
So even though he spent more overall, he also spent less per win. Granted, this scenario is unrealistic because Datsyuk is a goal scoring machine. He can't be bargained with. He can't be reasoned with. He doesn't feel pity, remorse, or fear. Still, the point stands.