Cincyfan78
Well-Known Member
Really? So you mean the sensible thing was for a 3rd party to come in and shove Kilpatrick instead of breaking up their pissing match like any other normal person would have done? If that were the case, then any intentional foul or what not would turn into a brawl. But they don't. Without the shove, players/refs/coaches intervene and it's over right there.
So again, please, GTFO!
This, I actually do agree with. Guys get "face palmed" all the time playing sports. The need for a 3rd party to come in and blind-side the UC player was not called for. Had that not happend, more than likely, the brawl doesn't occur.
of course, if the refs had done their job the entire game and kept the comments to a minimum by issuing T's on the players involved earlier, I think that would have settled most of it right there.