Ongoing NHL Thread - Part Brock and Roll Four Lines

[forty_three]

Five points out of a playoff spot in the weakest conference; I know, let's make a adolescent sex joke!

Can't wait until they raise a banner about it.

 

[forty_three]

That's sure to go over well.

 

[navamind]

At the Devils game tonight.

 

[sabresfaninthesouth]

If I had to determine a distinct kicking motion to save my life, I obviously couldn't do it.

Of note, called no goal on the ice, so this was seen as conclusively NOT a kicking motion enough to overturn.

 

[naslundfan19]

 

[dash]

 

[sabresfaninthesouth]

Scumbags gonna scumbag

 

[forty_three]

If I had to determine a distinct kicking motion to save my life, I obviously couldn't do it.

Of note, called no goal on the ice, so this was seen as conclusively NOT a kicking motion enough to overturn.

the only argument I can see for it standing was that the "kicking motion" did not make contact at the skate.

I did not say it was a good argument.

 

[dash]

the only argument I can see for it standing was that the "kicking motion" did not make contact at the skate.

I did not say it was a good argument.

Don't ask me, I'm still fuming about the Coleman call from last year's series against the Oil.

 

[dash]

 

[sabresfaninthesouth]

the only argument I can see for it standing was that the "kicking motion" did not make contact at the skate.

I did not say it was a good argument.

They asked Dave Jackson their rules "expert" during the broadcast and he said the exact point of contact on the foot or leg is irrelevant.

Given that I always he was a shit ref though,* I'm not sure I believe him.

*Nice guy though. Cool story bro time: met him in a hotel lounge in Nashville when he was still active and in town to do a preds game. Chatted about hockey for 20 minutes or so. Very personable guy, so I didn't tell him I thought he was a shit ref.

 

[sabresfaninthesouth]

Hmm... Didn't notice it was on Perry on the receiving end.

Should qualify for the "He probably deserved it" discount on whatever suspension is appropriate.

 

[forty_three]

They asked Dave Jackson their rules "expert" during the broadcast and he said the exact point of contact on the foot or leg is irrelevant.

Given that I always he was a shit ref though,* I'm not sure I believe him.

*Nice guy though. Cool story bro time: met him in a hotel lounge in Nashville when he was still active and in town to do a preds game. Chatted about hockey for 20 minutes or so. Very personable guy, so I didn't tell him I thought he was a shit ref.

If the purpose of the rule is to stop players from wildly swinging their knife feet, that makes perfect sense.

But we're talking about NHL rules enforcement here.

 

[puckhead]

Hmm... Didn't notice it was on Perry on the receiving end.

Should qualify for the "He probably deserved it" discount on whatever suspension is appropriate.

my thought exactly, that's the ONLY defense.

counter to that: well tony, you are as big of a shitbag as he is.

 

[dash]

my thought exactly, that's the ONLY defense.

counter to that: well tony, you are as big of a shitbag as he is.

Corey Perry is a Triple Gold Club shitbag

 

[sabresfaninthesouth]

Corey Perry is a Triple Gold Club shitbag

What is that, spitting, biting, and hair pulling?

 

[dash]

What is that, spitting, biting, and hair pulling?

Gotta have purse swinging in there somewhere...

 

[mattola]

Gotta have purse swinging in there somewhere...

the fact that this was not in that original message makes me wonder if @sabresfaninthesouth should be part of this place anymore..... shoulda been #1

 

[sabresfaninthesouth]

the fact that this was not in that original message makes me wonder if @sabresfaninthesouth should be part of this place anymore..... shoulda been #1

I also had to leave out licking, nut punching, skate stomping, crotch grabbing, turtling and probably a few others.

I blame @dash for limiting me to three.

 

[esls79]

Perry is not a hair puller. I will not stand for this.