- Thread starter
- #1
clyde_carbon
Unfkwthble
Is how often we throw screen passes to our RBs compared to other teams. It seems like we'd be at the bottom of the league in terms of throwing to our backs this and last season, no?
Is how often we throw screen passes to our RBs compared to other teams. It seems like we'd be at the bottom of the league in terms of throwing to our backs this and last season, no?
RB screens are quick to develop. Gore is a good receiver and Kap throws darts....a good combo for this play. The problem with Kap is that he can't put a soft touch on his longer passes...still darts. Not to mention him staring down anybody he is going to throw to so a screen play is better for him.not against throwing ANY RB screens, but in general it takes too long to develop. most teams don't run it much if at all? for me, not a problem if we don't call it.
also wondering if Kaep can do those short, TOUCH passes to the RB?
i'd rather Kaep just sets and throws, guess this means more crossing or 'rub' routes?
I can recall more WR screen plays than I can RB screen plays.
not against throwing ANY RB screens, but in general it takes too long to develop. most teams don't run it much if at all? for me, not a problem if we don't call it.
also wondering if Kaep can do those short, TOUCH passes to the RB?
i'd rather Kaep just sets and throws, guess this means more crossing or 'rub' routes?
Everyone expected that to be James's role, but they don't even try. I don't know what else it could mean beside he's been disappointing them in practice.
The 49ers do have some shitty luck when they do try to run screen passes. Not only did they have a blitzer, but Kap's spy in the middle was all over it and the defensive linemen did a good job of recognizing and following the offensive linemen to the right.
Maybe I'm wrong but I think it might be pretty hard to run screen passes when teams designate a QB spy.