- Thread starter
- #1
He's visiting on the 9th but I don't think there's any chance of it happening unless his appeal against the NCAA eligibility rules actually goes through and he's eligible this year. There's no way he comes here if he has to sit out a year.
now that we've lost Speight, depth at the position is once again a concern. So more QB's on the roster is good.
He's visiting on the 9th but I don't think there's any chance of it happening unless his appeal against the NCAA eligibility rules actually goes through and he's eligible this year. There's no way he comes here if he has to sit out a year.
now that we've lost Speight, depth at the position is once again a concern. So more QB's on the roster is good.
I'm hearing they think he won't have to sit out. Can play ASAP. That's the hot rumor.
I believe the Ole Miss ban allows ALL current Rebels to leave without having to sit a year out.
No, the ban allows players who's eligibility spans the length of the ban to transfer and not sit out a year. All other players who's eligibility would span beyond the ban are free to leave but must sit out a year.Ole Miss's ban allows all players to transfer without having to sit out a year.
So Michigan went from having like 7 QB's on the roster Harbaugh's first season to now only having 2(obviously Patterson would make a 3rd)?
That's because he's layered up with other players using Houston Nutt's lawyer and they are threatening the NCAA with a challenge.I'm hearing they think he won't have to sit out. Can play ASAP. That's the hot rumor.
No, the ban allows players who's eligibility spans the length of the ban to transfer and not sit out a year. All other players who's eligibility would span beyond the ban are free to leave but must sit out a year.