- Thread starter
- #1
Sportster 72
Well-Known Member
36 passes; 30 runs = Hail Victory
Yeah right up until you talk football with someone like that and they can make your head spin. I do think sometimes they get so caught up in trying to be slick they forget the simples stuff though. Good call ehb
Sometimes I think this board could coach, gm this team better than the people actually payed to do it.
36 passes; 30 runs = Hail Victory
The run game almost cost us a victory. The defense bailed us out. We gave the Giants a chance to win the game. The offense did not win this game.
The running game as the thread attests to. Helped the Skins achieve balance and maybe more importantly, helped the Skins do something for the first time this year. Win the TOP game, 33:26 to 26:34.
To Sty's point. I disagree with you, but not in the sense that I'm saying you're wrong. I just see it a little differently. The running game as the thread attests to. Helped the Skins achieve balance and maybe more importantly, helped the Skins do something for the first time this year. Win the TOP game, 33:26 to 26:34. Now some might say that's not a lot, but the Giants averaged a point for every minute they had the ball. What if instead of running the ball 2 or 3 times where they gained minimal yardage, but kept the clock running. The Skins instead threw 2 or 3 imc passes. Nothing really changes except the clock stops with every imc pass. So instead of the Giants getting the ball with a minute, 51 seconds and 2 time outs left. The Giants have 2 minutes and 51 sec/3 minutes 20 sec left with 2 TOs and the 2 min warning. The extra time and extra TO would allow them to play call differently. If the game follows the same trek it had been. Chances are decent the Giants kick a FG.
Now I'm not saying it would've been inevitable the Giants score again. If the Skins threw a couple imc passes into of run the ball a couple times. And not saying you're wrong about the running game almost costing the Skins the game. I think it helped the Skins win the game. The big issue I saw Sunday was our inability to score TDs inside the red zone. 4 trips into the red zone yesterday and 0 TDs. That's 14 trips into the red zone this year, 14 times in 3 games sounds damn good and shows the Skins are moving pretty good between the 20s. But only 3 TDs about 31% is not so good.
I did dig the shit out of the two TDs the Skins scored. That was beaut of a bomb by Cuz to Djax and JC is showing he can be more than a move the chains, safety valve type WR. Norman looked good for the most poart, coming up with that INT would've been nice and the two INTs the Skins did get were great plays.
Every aspect of the team minus the kickers made some miscues imo, but they also came up with some huge plays at critical times. Hopkins and Way have booth been on point.
It's kind of hard for me to believe that the fans/media don't have influence when they suddenly start running the ball and immediately switch Normal on the top receiver after hearing all the criticism. Just hard to believe that was an accident. Despite limited room I thought Jones did well, the fumble was just a huge hit. Kelly needs new cleats.
The key to the run game is not all about yards only, a very, very big part of the run game is getting the LBers to bite on play action so you open the zone defense some.