Sgt Brutus
Goober
It's pretty damn huge. Or how about they just pulled the #1 recruiting class?Being a top 25 team is not the only thing that determines relevancy...especially pre-season top 25 polls.
It's pretty damn huge. Or how about they just pulled the #1 recruiting class?Being a top 25 team is not the only thing that determines relevancy...especially pre-season top 25 polls.
Never said they wouldn't have a better record this year. Just said Michigan was equally as relevant. USC's ranking is based solely on hypothetical talent from recruiting rankings and a couple highly ranked individual players. USC hasn't had a 11+ win season in 6 years.now you're getting there that was funny. Seems I'm breaking through we'll get you there yet
Their recruiting is pretty much why they're in the top 25 poll. They haven't shown much on the field to justify being close to a consensus top 10 team.It's pretty damn huge. Or how about they just pulled the #1 recruiting class?
If I was a michigan fan I would be a lot less worried about SC. You're not even close to SC. I would be more worried about OSU and Michigan state who are also a world ahead of the wolverines, the rest of the BIG that Michigan will struggle with. And if you want to stress a PAC team it should be UtahBeing a top 25 team is not the only thing that determines relevancy...especially pre-season top 25 polls.
Do some research run some comparisons you're about to be disappointedNever said they wouldn't have a better record this year. Just said Michigan was equally as relevant. USC's ranking is based solely on hypothetical talent from recruiting rankings and a couple highly ranked individual players. USC hasn't had a 11+ win season in 6 years.
I'm not worried about SC -- as already mentioned, SC is about 4 years behind Michigan.If I was a michigan fan I would be a lot less worried about SC. You're not even close to SC. I would be more worried about OSU and Michigan state who are also a world ahead of the wolverines, the rest of the BIG that Michigan will struggle with. And if you want to stress a PAC team it should be Utah
Being a top 25 team is not the only thing that determines relevancy...especially pre-season top 25 polls.
No, he's going to take the two top 10 classes that are now juniors and seniors and make them relevant in the conference over night.Agreed. Where is meeeechegan starting the season off ranked again? That's what I though. Contrary to what you believe Crazy Jimbo doesn't make a 5-7 meeeechegan team that had the 61st ranked recruiting class in the nation & dead last in conference relevant overnight. He should turn them around, but he's not working any miracles w/ that roster in 2015.
Never said they wouldn't have a better record this year. Just said Michigan was equally as relevant. USC's ranking is based solely on hypothetical talent from recruiting rankings and a couple highly ranked individual players. USC hasn't had a 11+ win season in 6 years.
So exactly what you are saying Harbaugh will do at Michigan.
I see why @MAIZEandBLUE09 isn't worried about SC and why Notre Dane dropped Michigan from their schedule.They have been picked to finish 15th in a conference that has 14 teams!
I'm not worried about SC -- as already mentioned, SC is about 4 years behind Michigan.
I see why @MAIZEandBLUE09 isn't worried about SC and why Notre Dane dropped Michigan from their schedule.
seems like it's coming to thatmANDb09 is the Thumper of CFB.
Notice how A thread about michigan crying about MSU gets more reied than a thread asking if Michigan makes a bowl game. The future if Michigan football is bleak. SC would break 50 PTs on the wolverinesmANDb09 is the Thumper of CFB.
Maybe the wolverines quit the weedseems like it's coming to that
Notice how A thread about michigan crying about MSU gets more reied than a thread asking if Michigan makes a bowl game. The future if Michigan football is bleak. SC would break 50 PTs on the wolverines
seems like it's coming to that