ohio st receiver says would "wipe field" with bama or FSU

[7Samurai13]

I could see it.

How was your ban for trolling ?

Do less shrooms.

 

[BTSBuckeye]

Good god man. A Saban defense has given that many points 4 times for the whole game in the past 5+ years. 3 of those a Heisman winner was at QB. You bugeyes are the most football-challenged idiots on the planet.

Bringing up past statistics, then claiming others are football-challenged idiots. LMFAO

Texas A&M exposed Bama's secondary .... as did LSU in the first half. Hell, if LSU hadn't gotten in their own way in the first half, that game could have been much closer than it was.

So THIS YEAR ... the two best offenses Bama has played, have made Bama's defense look weakened. Coincidence ... I think not.

 

[Tharvot]

 

[Bamabino]

No idea what you are talking about.


I see you are right back at it.

The mod put it out there for everyone to see. You calling him a liar? Besides, the only one trolling is a dumbass unknown Bugeye receiver that wouldn't even make 7th string for Bama. Idiotic statement of the year.

 

[Rolltide94]

We have a better offensive line, a better stable of RBs (with a better bellcow), a more dynamic QB, better TEs, and we have offensive weapons for days. It would be a completely different monster.

Yes, it would a predictable and boring monster....and no, you don't have a better stable of running backs...guaranteed that at least two rb's from LSU go in the draft before the first buckeye. You probably have a better O-Line, but the rest is a push. I only wish FSU would lose so we could do what Stanford is going to do to you...that will be really "offensive".

 

[The Authority]

The mod put it out there for everyone to see. You calling him a liar?

You said 2nd

 

[The Authority]

Yes, it would a predictable and boring monster....and no, you don't have a better stable of running backs...guaranteed that at least two rb's from LSU go in the draft before the first buckeye. You probably have a better O-Line, but the rest is a push. I only wish FSU would lose so we could do what Stanford is going to do to you...that will be really "offensive".

Ooohhhhh. Hypothetical smack talk! What a burn.

 

[UNA Lion]

ohio st receiver says would "wipe field" with bama or FSU

In other news, a twig claimed it could beat a forest.

 

[CrimsonFan]

It would be like playing Notre dame all over again.... Try again

 

[BTSBuckeye]

Yes, it would a predictable and boring monster....and no, you don't have a better stable of running backs...guaranteed that at least two rb's from LSU go in the draft before the first buckeye. You probably have a better O-Line, but the rest is a push. I only wish FSU would lose so we could do what Stanford is going to do to you...that will be really "offensive".

That right there tells me either you haven't been paying attention to Ohio State ... or you're just blind to the facts.

Ohio State legitimately goes 5 deep at RB. Hyde, Hall, Wilson, Smith, and Elliot. Hyde is a monster whose draft stock keep rising with every game. Elliot might be the best back we have .... and he hardly ever sees the field since he's a true freshman. He's averaging nearly 9 yards per carry.

 

[BTSBuckeye]

It would be like playing Notre dame all over again.... Try again

Yeah, except Ohio State actually has an offense that can put pressure on defenses.

 

[Bamabino]

Bringing up past statistics, then claiming others are football-challenged idiots. LMFAO

Texas A&M exposed Bama's secondary .... as did LSU in the first half. Hell, if LSU hadn't gotten in their own way in the first half, that game could have been much closer than it was.

So THIS YEAR ... the two best offenses Bama has played, have made Bama's defense look weakened. Coincidence ... I think not.

LSU had 220 yards passing and only 17 points. Beckham and Landry had a combined 3 catches and 32 yards in the 2nd half. Keep trying to convince yourself Bama's D is weak.

 

[Rolltide94]

Bringing up past statistics, then claiming others are football-challenged idiots. LMFAO

Texas A&M exposed Bama's secondary .... as did LSU in the first half. Hell, if LSU hadn't gotten in their own way in the first half, that game could have been much closer than it was.

So THIS YEAR ... the two best offenses Bama has played, have made Bama's defense look weakened. Coincidence ... I think not.

Texas A&M was week 2. Our secondary has come a long way since then...as I'm sure the Buckeyes have since giving up 34 points to the last place PAC-12 team...whose only win is against Portland St.

I was reasonably happy with the play of our secondary vs LSU given the talent of their receivers and the improvement of Mett. Just as I'm sure I would be happy with their performance against Miller and whoever the receivers are for the Buckeyes.

 

[Mike30142]

I believe FSU to be the better team than OSU, but I'd love to see FSU somehow lose, and it come down to Bama vs OSU. Then, and only then, we'd see who's who.

 

[GreenNickle]

Picture is blurry, but that is Evan Spencer, my boys favorite player, he ran over at the end of the Cal game and gave them a high five.
Kinda interesting that his Dad was one of my favorites when I was a kid.

Go Buckeyes
Beat Michigan

 

[UNA Lion]

Texas A&M was week 2. Our secondary has come a long way since then...as I'm sure the Buckeyes have since giving up 34 points to the last place PAC-12 team...whose only win is against Portland St.

Another thing to note about the TAMU game was that Bama chose to get into a shooting match with their opponent, instead of practicing the slow, grinding, ball-control offense they've chosen since that game. In short, the coaches learned their lesson.

 

[BTSBuckeye]

LSU had 220 yards passing and only 17 points. Beckham and Landry had a combined 3 catches and 32 yards in the 2nd half. Keep trying to convince yourself Bama's D is weak.

LSU also couldn't get out of their own way. LSU is ranked 92 in the country at -4 Turn over Margin.
Ohio State on the other hand is tied for 9th at +9.

 

[Rolltide94]

That right there tells me either you haven't been paying attention to Ohio State ... or you're just blind to the facts.

Ohio State legitimately goes 5 deep at RB. Hyde, Hall, Wilson, Smith, and Elliot. Hyde is a monster whose draft stock keep rising with every game. Elliot might be the best back we have .... and he hardly ever sees the field since he's a true freshman. He's averaging nearly 9 yards per carry.

I have Hyde on my college fantasy team...doesn't mean I think he is a better back than Hill...or that Ohio St's backs are deeper than LSU...

 

[Bamabino]

LSU also couldn't get out of their own way. LSU is ranked 92 in the country at -4 Turn over Margin.
Ohio State on the other hand is tied for 9th at +9.

Meaningless stat,especially playing Bugeyed State's midmajor schedule.

 

[Bandwagonbo2]

We have a better offensive line, a better stable of RBs (with a better bellcow), a more dynamic QB, better TEs, and we have offensive weapons for days. It would be a completely different monster.

Speculation, opinion but really light on actual fact. Seems we might be missing a few key ingredients here, facts and objectivity.