- Thread starter
- #1
puckhead
Custom User Title
Spector on Canucks: Hordichuks expertise
and shame on Spector for turning this dreck into an article.
Dealing tough guy Hordichuk may have been a mistake for the Canucks.
That's where Hordichuk comes in. Or, he would have come in, had the Canucks not sent him packing.
"It's like having a gun in the house," he said of having a player of his skill set on the roster. "You're not going to use it a lot of the time, but when you need it, it's there.
"It wasn't there, and it was the biggest games of the year."
Vancouver's response to thuggery last year was a 25% powerplay.
Just unfortunate that it dried up in the finals (and we ran into a 0.950 goalie).
If we get a fighter that can play effectively more than 3 min a game, that's great.
You, Mr Hordichuk, had your chance, but are not that player.
and shame on Spector for turning this dreck into an article.
Dealing tough guy Hordichuk may have been a mistake for the Canucks.
That's where Hordichuk comes in. Or, he would have come in, had the Canucks not sent him packing.
"It's like having a gun in the house," he said of having a player of his skill set on the roster. "You're not going to use it a lot of the time, but when you need it, it's there.
"It wasn't there, and it was the biggest games of the year."
Vancouver's response to thuggery last year was a 25% powerplay.
Just unfortunate that it dried up in the finals (and we ran into a 0.950 goalie).
If we get a fighter that can play effectively more than 3 min a game, that's great.
You, Mr Hordichuk, had your chance, but are not that player.
Last edited by a moderator:
