NYG-TB trade

[deanpet21]

Well if NYG take Chubb at #2 that would mean the 3rd rated QB would be aviable at pick #4. If Cle takes Darnold #1 then they should trade down with Buf or Mia. Barkley could be there at #5. Intresting.

 

[skinsdad62]

If I am the giants I take SB, if I am the browns i take SB and then qb at 4,

 

[Skins2021]

Well if NYG take Chubb at #2 that would mean the 3rd rated QB would be aviable at pick #4. If Cle takes Darnold #1 then they should trade down with Buf or Mia. Barkley could be there at #5. Intresting.

its nothing but a salary dump

QB, Chubb, and Barkley are still all very much in play

 

[deanpet21]

If I am the giants I take SB, if I am the browns i take SB and then qb at 4,

Browns are taking Darnold at #1.

 

[skinsdad62]

Browns are taking Darnold at #1.

Says conventional wisdom but I wouldn’t nor should the Browns

 

[Sportster 72]

The Browns supposedly had 453945839534535353 people at Darnold's pro day this past week.

 

[Stymietee]

Well if NYG take Chubb at #2 that would mean the 3rd rated QB would be aviable at pick #4. If Cle takes Darnold #1 then they should trade down with Buf or Mia. Barkley could be there at #5. Intresting.

With this trade, your idea, seeing him at #5 becomes a bit more plausible.

 

[deanpet21]

With this trade, your idea, seeing him at #5 becomes a bit more plausible.

im crossing my fingers. lol

 

[Stymietee]

im crossing my fingers. lol

Dude, if Bruce pulls something like that off and more important, in the manner in which you've prescribed, remind me to post something that gives big props to him for doing so. I'll be damned impressed!!

 

[countryroads316]

If the Browns don't take Barkley 1st and a QB 4th then they are the dumbest franchise in history

 

[MilkSpiller22]

If the Browns don't take Barkley 1st and a QB 4th then they are the dumbest franchise in history

i 100% disagree... i think taking a QB at 4 makes no sense for cleveland NO MATTER WHAT... if they draft a QB it has to be at 1 overall...

for these three reasons:

1. QBs demand the money...
2. you are telling your drafted qb that he wasn't worth being the number one- plays with his confidence.... QB confidence is just as important as skill
3. you are potentially passing on the better QBs on your board- this is the biggest reason, Who wants the second best QB?? a loser thats who!!!

 

[countryroads316]

i 100% disagree... i think taking a QB at 4 makes no sense for cleveland NO MATTER WHAT... if they draft a QB it has to be at 1 overall...

for these three reasons:

1. QBs demand the money...
2. you are telling your drafted qb that he wasn't worth being the number one- plays with his confidence.... QB confidence is just as important as skill
3. you are potentially passing on the better QBs on your board- this is the biggest reason, Who wants the second best QB?? a loser thats who!!!

The QB they draft is not playing anyways with Tyrod Taylor there

 

[Stymietee]

i 100% disagree... i think taking a QB at 4 makes no sense for cleveland NO MATTER WHAT... if they draft a QB it has to be at 1 overall...

for these three reasons:

1. QBs demand the money...
2. you are telling your drafted qb that he wasn't worth being the number one- plays with his confidence.... QB confidence is just as important as skill
3. you are potentially passing on the better QBs on your board- this is the biggest reason, Who wants the second best QB?? a loser thats who!!!

I really don't think Cleveland will take a QB until much later if at all in this draft. They will take Barkley with the #1 pick then trade down with #4. I believe that they are going to ride with TT for a minute.

 

[MilkSpiller22]

I really don't think Cleveland will take a QB until much later if at all in this draft. They will take Barkley with the #1 pick then trade down with #4. I believe that they are going to ride with TT for a minute.

this is a possibility... i just think if you are going to draft a QB in the first 2 rounds, it is stupid not to take the best QB available at your first pick...

 

[MilkSpiller22]

The QB they draft is not playing anyways with Tyrod Taylor there

doesn't matter, you dont NOT take the best qb...

 

[countryroads316]

doesn't matter, you dont NOT take the best qb...

sorry but Barkley is the best player point blank I'm not taking Darnold when Allen at 4 will be just as good maybe even better while he develops under Taylor

 

[MilkSpiller22]

sorry but Barkley is the best player point blank I'm not taking Darnold when Allen at 4 will be just as good maybe even better while he develops under Taylor

i am not disagreeing with you that they should take Barkley at one... just it would be stupid to draft a qb at 4 then...

 

[Stymietee]

this is a possibility... i just think if you are going to draft a QB in the first 2 rounds, it is stupid not to take the best QB available at your first pick...

Oh, I agree, I just don't see them entertaining the idea because they have Taylor who's already been tabbed the starter. I believe Hue Jackson actually said, that he's (TT) the starter and will be without competition for that role.

 

[Sleepy T]

I expect the GMen to trade the pick. Now, if I am the team trading, I don’t want the trade done until AFTER the Browns pick. I look for a Buffalo to make a major play to move up to #2

 

[Sharkinva]

i am not disagreeing with you that they should take Barkley at one... just it would be stupid to draft a qb at 4 then...

Barkley ay #1, trade down from 4 to 14 and take Jackson at 14. Have JAckson play sit and learn behind Taylor.

But seriously, we saw what the Browns did with the last top five RB they drafted.