- Thread starter
- #1
IPostedWhat
I'm So High Right Now
Now I know that Rask had a very good year in the limited number of games that he played, and he played well enough to get past the Sabres in the first round of the PO's, but I think that this guy has a man crush going on.
Before I post what he said, let me just say that Miller had a .939 SV% and a GAA around 1.81 for a period of around 30-35 games I would say? Rask only played 45 all year. Who knows what Rask's numbers would of looked like if he started around 65 games the whole season?
The Sabres, like the Devils, basically were a .500 team from late January on. And Tuukka Rask posted better numbers than Ryan Miller all season, including in the last two weeks. It's not Rask's fault he didn't play more during the first half of the season. If he had, he'd be winning the Vezina and Calder on June 23 in Las Vegas. But people have to realize that he may be the best goalie still standing, and on a very well-coached team, this Bruins run may be a long ways from being done.
First-round upsets? Look again - NHL Network
Before I post what he said, let me just say that Miller had a .939 SV% and a GAA around 1.81 for a period of around 30-35 games I would say? Rask only played 45 all year. Who knows what Rask's numbers would of looked like if he started around 65 games the whole season?
The Sabres, like the Devils, basically were a .500 team from late January on. And Tuukka Rask posted better numbers than Ryan Miller all season, including in the last two weeks. It's not Rask's fault he didn't play more during the first half of the season. If he had, he'd be winning the Vezina and Calder on June 23 in Las Vegas. But people have to realize that he may be the best goalie still standing, and on a very well-coached team, this Bruins run may be a long ways from being done.
First-round upsets? Look again - NHL Network