- Thread starter
- #601
He's gonna be a guard and there are better tackles left IMO.
I'm not saying your opinion is wrong, i'm simply bored...
My max height in the military was 6'2" and I had 38" arms. I'm 6'0" now and I still have 38" arms.
33" arms are very small, especially for a guy 6'4". You have to understand that arm length is measured from the center of the neck to hand side of the wrist bone with the arm lifted to shoulder height and bent with the hand pointing to the front of the body. You know what I'm saying if you've ever been professionally fitted for a suit or a tux.
Well 1) If you have to rely on Walterfootball to prove a point I would say that is a terrible place to go. I understand other places have said it as well.
but to me if a guy has great technique then size/length becomes less of an issue and I trust Munchak to get the most out of him.
3) If he does move into guard honestly it is still a win for me.
lolzzz not trying to prove anything, just posted another opinion.
In today's game there aren't a lot of successful 6'4 tackles with shortish arms, I trust Munchak as well, to make him a good guard.
Agreed, but you said he was the last good tackle, that's what I commented on.