- Thread starter
- #1
So we're average height, but heavy and young?
Whee
More width (i.e. body girth) for blocking shots?!? Torts approves.
Rockies are just a bunch of old fatties.
Stats too simple.
Needs more blocked passes by players 6'1"-6'2.5" that are ages 25-29 that occur in the neutral zone between the 12th and 17th minute. I need to know if my team has the best 6'1.5" 27 year old at this in the league so I can brag on HFBoards about my team being the best at one analytic.
This is totally what good statistical analysis is about.
I mean, it's no "zone starts" or "Unblocked Shot Attempt Percentage - Tied" which are actual fucking things people apparently measure players by on NHL.com.
You've played hockey before I'm guessing. Do you not think that which zone you start out in affects what happens and what you're able to accomplish during your shift?
I don't need numbers to tell me that if I need a faceoff win in my zone, I'm going to "start" my best faceoff player.
But if you know that one of them starts their shift in the offensive zone almost twice as often as the other you might reach a different conclusion.
I think people who watch hockey enough know the difference between a soft, floating 60 point Euro and a 60 point "200 foot player". Hockey really doesn't need numbers like this.
So...it's basically just nerdifying the "eye test".
I think people who watch hockey enough know the difference between a soft, floating 60 point Euro and a 60 point "200 foot player". Hockey really doesn't need numbers like this.
Stats are nice but intangibles are where it's really at.