- Thread starter
- #1
"in 1998, Peyton Manning was as safe and pro-ready a quarterback prospect as they come. In 2011, Cam Newton was seen as a spectacular athlete, but a risk because he was raw at the position.
Both started in Week 1 as rookies, Newton with a truncated offseason. Their respective numbers through six weeks …
MANNING (1998): 113-210 (53.8 percent), 1,346 yards, 6 TD, 14 INT
NEWTON (2011): 134-229 (58.5 percent), 1,847 yards, 7 TD, 9 INT
So Newton threw more, for a higher completion percentage, more yards, more touchdowns and fewer interceptions than Manning. Both players' teams were 1-5 at that juncture."
dude is str8 up playing LIKE A BOSS!!! and with that ppl are going to look at athletic qbs in a new light after him because are generation knows you have to throw the ball down field you have be be accurate however you cant shake the god given talent to get ghost at any time run ppl over and play 16 games it will be interesting to see where he falls ... i could see top 10 after jones
Both started in Week 1 as rookies, Newton with a truncated offseason. Their respective numbers through six weeks …
MANNING (1998): 113-210 (53.8 percent), 1,346 yards, 6 TD, 14 INT
NEWTON (2011): 134-229 (58.5 percent), 1,847 yards, 7 TD, 9 INT
So Newton threw more, for a higher completion percentage, more yards, more touchdowns and fewer interceptions than Manning. Both players' teams were 1-5 at that juncture."
dude is str8 up playing LIKE A BOSS!!! and with that ppl are going to look at athletic qbs in a new light after him because are generation knows you have to throw the ball down field you have be be accurate however you cant shake the god given talent to get ghost at any time run ppl over and play 16 games it will be interesting to see where he falls ... i could see top 10 after jones