nefansince75
Well-Known Member
You have to recognize the difference between selecting at 16 and 30, right? Teams look to land a difference maker with their first round pick. The selecting of guys with injuries has been a gamble to get a difference maker. At 16 there should be no need to gamble to get a difference maker, but by the time 30 rolls around the pickings are slim, not for a good player, but a difference maker.Which means we'll be getting a DT who had multiple knee surgeries and will be on IR all season.
A center because centers matter.
A left footed kicker from Europe with a third round pick.
Then trade the other 7 pics for future drafts.
Book it.
BB used that strategy with Gronkowski in the second round and landed arguably the best player drafted that year (either him or Antonio Brown). That one deal justifies a lot of the misses used for injured players. After the difference makers are gone draft misses are easier to fix through signing the right UDF or good free agent signings. Therefore, if no blue chip difference maker is left then whatever is lost can be fixed. Haven't the Pats had more success nabbing productive UDFs over the past 10 years than missing on drafting players with injuries?
It's easy to second guess the misses when we later see good players by other teams drafted after, but if those guys were considered blue chippers they would have been gone earlier.