MLB One Player Per Team Draft : CHAT

[Ritzarmy]

No im asking can I take 3 separate players one from each Boston, Milwaukee and Atlanta.

I said yes.

Player A played for Boston from 1940-1945
Player B played for Milwaukee from 1950-1958
Player C played for Atlanta from 1960-1968

You just can't have a player play the 5yrs for 2 different named teams. If player played for Boston from 1940-42 then Milwaukee from 43-50. You couldn't count Boston cuz it's less then 5yrs.

 

[UK Cowboy]

You should be good at these types of debates WLK, you've coached Tee Ball

 

[Nosferatu]

That's fine if it's more then 30. I just want order. To many restrictions causes problems it seems.

You can have a player for Houston expos who played 5yrs straight, then have a player from Washington nationals who played 5yrs straight even though expos became Nats. It's counted as 2 separate teams. You just can't have the years run into each other.

 

[Ritzarmy]

I think it's way too much like a no restrictions all-time draft when you're including a ton more than 30 teams and UK said he was fine for it counting for both, but whatever I don't want to cause more arguments

500 I'm trying to make it simple because the other way caused problems.

 

[Ritzarmy]

I made it simple and started over like everyone wanted. I answered your question. Now if you still have a question text me. If you don't then make your pick.

 

[UK Cowboy]

500 I'm trying to make it simple because the other way caused problems.

It doesn't matter to me, I won't draft a Twin either way

 

[UK Cowboy]

I made it simple and started over like everyone wanted. I answered your question. Now if you still have a question text me. If you don't then make your pick.

Gold is up

 

[Pack 500]

500 I'm trying to make it simple because the other way caused problems.

The other way caused problems because people didn't know who was eligible or not. Every player is eligible now so that's not an issue. It's pretty simple knowing that any Senators players count the same as Twins because they're the same franchise.

 

[UK Cowboy]

The other way caused problems because people didn't know who was eligible or not. Every player is eligible now so that's not an issue. It's pretty simple knowing that any Senators players count the same as Twins because they're the same franchise.

Ritz is trying to make it simple, which is a good thing. I think eliminating both teams is still easy, but I'm good either way

 

[Pack 500]

It doesn't matter to me, I won't draft a Twin either way

Good sport

 

[Ritzarmy]

I'll text Gold.

 

[wlk3]

I said yes.

Player A played for Boston from 1940-1945
Player B played for Milwaukee from 1950-1958
Player C played for Atlanta from 1960-1968

You just can't have a player play the 5yrs for 2 different named teams. If player played for Boston from 1940-42 then Milwaukee from 43-50. You couldn't count Boston cuz it's less then 5yrs.

So if a player played with himself for 5 years 14-19, would that mean he played for the home team... And what if he played with himself for 5 straight years but had a girlfriend who would let him in the back door within that time frame... Would he then be a pirate...?

 

[Ritzarmy]

So if a player played with himself for 5 years 14-19, would that mean he played for the home team... And what if he played with himself for 5 straight years but had a girlfriend who would let him in the back door within that time frame... Would he then be a pirate...?

Dude don't make me ban the first person from mock drafts

 

[Nosferatu]

My other question is why don't we do as 500 has suggested its wrong to be able to pick players from the same franchise, kinda goes against your idea for this draft doesn't it?

 

[Nosferatu]

It doesn't matter to me, I won't draft a Twin either way

Thanks, but the question wasn't just referring to you.

 

[Ritzarmy]

My other question is why don't we do as 500 has suggested its wrong to be able to pick players from the same franchise, kinda goes against your idea for this draft doesn't it?

Because people will say I didn't know the nationals used to be the expos. Why not keep it simple so people don't screw up and we redo the draft again.

 

[Ritzarmy]

I picked Babe Ruth as a Red Sox. I can not change my mind later and make him a Yankee so I can take a sox player. Once you designate your team it's final.

 

[Nosferatu]

Because people will say I didn't know the nationals used to be the expos. Why not keep it simple so people don't screw up and we redo the draft again.

In my opinion you aren't making it simple you are just making it more like a wide open draft not the draft you intended it to be.

 

[Nosferatu]

I picked Babe Ruth as a Red Sox. I can not change my mind later and make him a Yankee so I can take a sox player. Once you designate your team it's final.

Another rule I don't agree with...

 

[Pack 500]

Another rule I don't agree with...

In the NFL one team draft we were allowed to change teams and there were no issues