Milk’s attempt for a 32 owner fantasy football league part XIII

[HaroldSeattle]

i know there is one site i am forgetting

Fleaflicker

 

[Chef99]

Fleaflicker

Yep, that's the one I was trying to think of.

 

[MilkSpiller22]

Fleaflicker

Tried that too. Max 24 teams. Not the one i forgot. lol.

 

[TREFF]

the conference rooms of Fantrax, MyFantasyLeague, flea flicker -

Intern - "hey should we allow 32 team leagues?"

CEO - Who would be that crazy? no way that will ever be a thing.

 

[MilkSpiller22]

the conference rooms of Fantrax, MyFantasyLeague, flea flicker -

Intern - "hey should we allow 32 team leagues?"

CEO - Who would be that crazy? no way that will ever be a thing.

no... problem is the free way.... there are many 32 team leagues.... we just the cheap-o-s doing a test run...

 

[tlance]

thats a contradiction If each draft is a different conference cant draft the same player in each league
btw id be interested if u can get 16 teams

It was Milk’s idea to do conference only.

Mine was just a general draft where we make sure no player ends up on multiple teams.

 

[MilkSpiller22]

so here is the question guys....

are we doing 2 separate drafts/leagues one NFC and the other AFC

or we doing only one??

and which one are we doing??

@wilwhite
@tlance
@Chef99
@molsaniceman
@Jiddy
@jwolt92
@StuUKWI
@SmokingMonkey
@TREFF

we also only have 10 owners... we need to find 6 more...

 

[Chef99]

so here is the question guys....

are we doing 2 separate drafts/leagues one NFC and the other AFC

or we doing only one??

and which one are we doing??

@wilwhite
@tlance
@Chef99
@molsaniceman
@Jiddy
@jwolt92
@StuUKWI
@SmokingMonkey
@TREFF

we also only have 10 owners... we need to find 6 more...

The one AFC one NFC is kinda interesting...especially if we get to keep the player if he is traded to the other conference.

 

[wilwhite]

so here is the question guys....

are we doing 2 separate drafts/leagues one NFC and the other AFC

or we doing only one??

and which one are we doing??

@wilwhite
@tlance
@Chef99
@molsaniceman
@Jiddy
@jwolt92
@StuUKWI
@SmokingMonkey
@TREFF

we also only have 10 owners... we need to find 6 more...

If the goal is really about an eventual 32-owner league, I say do one conference. Two separate leagues just seems like two leagues.

If we want to test a 32-team league with 16 owners, we should go ahead and pay for it.

 

[Chef99]

If the goal is really about an eventual 32-owner league, I say do one conference. Two separate leagues just seems like two leagues.

If we want to test a 32-team league with 16 owners, we should go ahead and pay for it.

I'm fine with a pay league for this concept.

But aren't we getting back to square one in a way?

Eventually getting 32 owners.

 

[wilwhite]

@MilkSpiller22 this is your baby - do you want to do a 32-team pay league, a single-conference free league, or two single-conference free leagues?

I'm inclined to go ahead and pay, because being able to trade with the other 30 teams is important IMO.

 

[MilkSpiller22]

@MilkSpiller22 this is your baby - do you want to do a 32-team pay league, a single-conference free league, or two single-conference free leagues?

I'm inclined to go ahead and pay, because being able to trade with the other 30 teams is important IMO.

I know. But we don’t even have the 16 owners yet. And I know we would lose one or two if we turned it into a money league.

At this point i think it is best to have a tester season to see what works and what doesn’t.

But it seems clear to me that this will have to become a money league dynasty in the future.

If once we get the 16 and they are all willing to make it a money league. 25 dollar fee. Then I would be happy to make it what it is supposed to be.

 

[wilwhite]

I know. But we don’t even have the 16 owners yet. And I know we would lose one or two if we turned it into a money league.

At this point i think it is best to have a tester season to see what works and what doesn’t.

But it seems clear to me that this will have to become a money league dynasty in the future.

If once we get the 16 and they are all willing to make it a money league. 25 dollar fee. Then I would be happy to make it what it is supposed to be.

Owners won't commit if we haven't even figured out what we're doing. Probably whatever we decide we can get to 16, pay or no. Just gotta decide.

I vote single conference for free on Fantrax or pay and have two teams on Fantrax.

 

[molsaniceman]

@MilkSpiller22 this is your baby - do you want to do a 32-team pay league, a single-conference free league, or two single-conference free leagues?

I'm inclined to go ahead and pay, because being able to trade with the other 30 teams is important IMO.

not sure why u have to pay since fantrax allows 200 teams in a league

 

[wilwhite]

not sure why u have to pay since fantrax allows 200 teams in a league



View attachment 370625

When you try to save it says "You have added a premium feature!"

 

[molsaniceman]

well im not interested in pay league but if its free count me in
another option is for 16 teams is use the top 16 nfl teams by pre season rankings instead of the conference one

 

[wilwhite]

well im not interested in pay league but if its free count me in
another option is for 16 teams is use the top 16 nfl teams by pre season rankings instead of the conference one

To be a fair comparison for a 32-team league, though, you need some bad teams.

I say just one 16-team FF league, with player pool limited to 16 NFL teams. Agnostic about which 16.

 

[molsaniceman]

To be a fair comparison for a 32-team league, though, you need some bad teams.

I say just one 16-team FF league, with player pool limited to 16 NFL teams. Agnostic about which 16

10 afc and 6 nfc are ranked in the top 16

 

[broncosmitty]

AL only leagues were fun back in the day.

You get down to the nitty gritty on the waiver wire when you exclude half the players.

 

[wilwhite]

I think we need to have some terrible teams in there, so I vote NFC.