I agree. Heck just turning the third WR into a flex WR/RB/TE would appeal to me more. I won’t be against a extra bench spot either. However I’m fine with how it is set up now ( except for the slow draft, that’s for masochist and sadist folk).
Well we all load up on RBs to cover injury already, so all it means is you might get more bang for the buck with your Extra RBs. Not expecting that to get adapted. Making room for a extra TE seems pointless, after a small handful they are all mostly chumps. So why do that? So you can gamble on a injury prone TE and still have room for that chump? No thanks. You want to draft a TE like Reeds you take your chances, no insurance policies.
Meh, minor twicks are no big deal. Just because it’s not broke , doesn’t mean it’s as good as it get. Reminds me of the father talking to his son. “ Son why don’t you listen to my twenty years of experience?”
Going to add to the “If it’s not broke don’t fix it”mentally. Riding horses worked for the longest time for transportation, it wasn’t broke so no need for cars and airplanes, right? We all need to consider changes for their merit, not just vote down a idea because what we have works.
I think anyone with saddlesores, a bow legged walk, or the need to travel faster would seriously disagree with riding horseback as an example of not being broke
IDK they did it for the longest time. Pretty sure folks turned their noses up at the first attempts at a automobile. My point being changes need to be judged on their merit, not some auto reject attitude.
True. And like I mentioned, I think all the ideas presented in this thread would be, at worst, "acceptable" tweaks, maybe even good ones. Ones that if they got support, I'd be fine with. Doesn't mean I necessarily want them, ya know?
Honestly I am not hankering for any changes myself ( well other then the slow draft, that got to get thrown to the wayside), I just dislike seeing ideas shot down simply because it’s a change, with out considering the merit of said change. Feel your with me on this.
It may not seem like it at first glance, but yes, I am, usuallyHonestly I am not hankering for any changes myself ( well other then the slow draft, that got to get thrown to the wayside), I just dislike seeing ideas shot down simply because it’s a change, with out considering the merit of said change. Feel your with me on this.
.
Well being open to change is one of greatest attributes of mankind. Gives us a leg up over the apes and such.It may not seem like it at first glance, but yes, I am, usually
Things I'll dismiss out of hand are anything the fundamentally changes the entire league, and almost anything that makes things "easier", otherwise I'm all ears
