- Thread starter
- #61
theboardref
thewhite_00 ESPN board
He's also in for making Michigan great again.
![193803-rich-rodriguez.jpg](/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fs1.ibtimes.com%2Fsites%2Fwww.ibtimes.com%2Ffiles%2Fstyles%2Fv2_article_large%2Fpublic%2F2011%2F11%2F21%2F193803-rich-rodriguez.jpg&hash=7ce4fae7a380840753be7b53752a2cd8)
He also had 4 seasons with 1 loss or less where he didn't even go a bowl because of how the structure was back then. He also had a stretch of 10 years finishing ranked in the top 10 of the AP and won 13 conference titles. He was indisputably a better coach than Lloyd Carr.But not when it really mattered. Bo had a shot at winning a national title on at least one occasion had he won the bowl game.
He's in for making Michigan great again, are you?
![]()
Different times, hard to compare.He also had 4 seasons with 1 loss or less where he didn't even go a bowl because of how the structure was back then. He also had a stretch of 10 years finishing ranked in the top 10 of the AP and won 13 conference titles. He was indisputably a better coach than Lloyd Carr.
I did, in fact, create this gif. But that was to celebrate the hiring of Harbaugh. Which, as a Michigan fan, was a relief after a pretty bad 8-10 years.
Half as many conference titles, nowhere near as many top 10 teams, half as many Rose Bowl wins, nowhere near as good of a record. Pretty easy. If Bo wasn't born in Ohio, you wouldn't be arguing for Lloyd and you know it.Different times, hard to compare.
Saved. Thank you.
I suspect you will be using my creation with malice.Saved. Thank you.
I suspect you will be using my work with malice.
I did, in fact, create this gif. But that was to celebrate the hiring of Harbaugh. Which, as a Michigan fan, was a relief after a pretty bad 8-10 years.
Because we sucked for those years?Nah, but those bad 8-10 years don't erase the previous 50 years, so why did you need to change coaches?
Because we sucked for those years?
What's funny is Michigan fans are so pumped about Harbaugh who had a worse record than Hoke did his first year, with ended up being an easier schedule than Hoke did. No real signature win unless you want to count a mediocre Northwestern or a Florida who was missing 60% of there offense.Nah, but those bad 8-10 years don't erase the previous 50 years, so why did you need to change coaches?
You know you've been owned when you start creating threads in response to being owned in an argument in another.
So is Michigan only good because of Ohio State? Their best coachof the last century, cut his teeth at Ohio State.