Lunardi is full of it

[podsox]

he just said yesterday if nd wins they are in. Today after the win he says they are still on the outside looking inZ. I'm not saying nd is deserving but hilarious all the nonsense this guy talks. he has insiders on the committee. A few yrs ago he had st Mary's in the tourney the entire last wkend and suddenly woke up Sunday morning with them out. And guess what they got left out.

 

[rmilia1]

If you're really trying to get the best at large teams I don't see how you can leave ND out with Colson back

 

[douggie]

If you're reay trying to get the best atarge teams I don't see how you can leave ND out with Colson back

And if they had DJ Harvey there would be no question. Bonzie is an All-American- Double/Double guy

 

[PhilSimms11]

I was looking on Fox Sports the other day and Howie Schwab has Wagner as a 15-seed at-large. They lost to LIU-Brooklyn in their conference tourney and have an RPI of 110. Are you kidding me?

 

[CycleandJazz]

ND should be in the Tournament. They are clearly now not the team that lost double-digit games.

 

[PhilSimms11]

I'll almost be happy if OU doesn't get in. I'm a Sooner fan, but damn....forget about it.

 

[ericd7633]

If you're really trying to get the best at large teams I don't see how you can leave ND out with Colson back

I still think they'd be a bubble team, at least based on the results with him playing. They have 2 combined Q1/Q2 wins OOC with him, but they also have 2 Q3 losses OOC with him. They played the entire OOC portion of their , schedule with him and managed to beat only 1 at-large caliber team, while suffering 2 losses to non NIT teams. With him back they've beaten Pitt twice and Va. Tech, but it's not like they looked super impressive against Va. Tech, and it's not like Va. Tech is a top 25 team, they'll likely be an 8-10 seed.

Their record with him is 13-5(against D1) with an RPI of 61 and an SOS of 106.

They have just as many combined Q1/Q2 wins with him as they did without him.

 

[mr.hockey4242]

ND should be in the Tournament. They are clearly now not the team that lost double-digit games.

Yes, they are now the team that lost to Ball State and Indiana

 

[CycleandJazz]

Yes, they are now the team that lost to Ball State and Indiana

And North Carolina is the team that lost to Wofford.

 

[mr.hockey4242]

And North Carolina is the team that lost to Wofford.

So? UNC has a resume. ND does not.

What’s so clearly about ND?

Since Colson returned they beat Pitt twice(the worst team in a high major and one was barely). They beat VT in a massive implosion(both teams looked awful), then they got waxed by Duke

You’re right, clearly not the same team

 

[SteelersPride]

So? UNC has a resume. ND does not.

What’s so clearly about ND?

Since Colson returned they beat Pitt twice(the worst team in a high major and one was barely). They beat VT in a massive implosion(both teams looked awful), then they got waxed by Duke

You’re right, clearly not the same team

this

 

[douggie]

Currently from Lunardi:

Kenpom

South
1-UVA 1
2-Cincy 4
3-Tennessee 11
4-Tex Tech 12
5-Ohio State 15

Ave rating:8.6

West
1-Xavier 14
2-UNC 7
3-Michigan 10
4-Zona 21
5-Clemson 18

Ave rating 14

East
1-Nova 2
2-Duke 3
3-Michigan State 6
4-WVU 13
5-UK 19

Ave rating 8.6

MW
1-Kansas 9
2-Purdue 5
3-Auburn 16
4-Wichita State 20
5-Gonzaga 8

Ave rating 11.6

 

[NolePride]

Per the Thread Title.

I copied out his bracketology from this morning and also USA Today's oredicts.

I've forgotten to do that for 3 or 4 years. I remembered today. I want to see
how close they really are.

Teams picked
The play-in's
The seeds
The Regions

Probably won't worry much about the exact opponent. I want to see if they are
full of it.