UVA_Guy81
Well-Known Member
Better yet, if Ted were involved all the way back in 91, he wouldn't have let that idiot Jim Herd run off one of the cornerstones of the promotion, Ric Flair. The thing with Bischoff is is that yes, he did have a formula that worked for a good couple of years, which was put the cruiserweights and non-established guys on in the first half and then put your more recognizable names on in the 2nd half. The problem though is that it was extremely rare for anyone that was usually on in the first hour-hour and a half to break through that glass ceiling to even sniff a main event program.Vince was massively on the ropes 95-97 and had Turner been more involved he could’ve strong armed the pay per view companies the way Vince did to Crockett though. Bischoff did great things for WCW but nearly all of his bad ideas or judgements wouldn’t have happened if Ted were involved, hell Ted didn’t even hire Bischoff. IMO Ted Turner was the biggest mistake, if you are the only yes vote on an asset, you have to treat that asset as though it is your baby. (Even during the Bischoff years) Don’t allow people who hate it have final say.
Ted Turner was the only one who wanted WCW while the other executives were too busy worrying about their own standing with the two historic mergers that happened. Who knows if Bischoff was a good or bad leader, but he wasn’t Vince McMahon and have final say.
Though, I do blame Bischoff for how crappy the wrestling product is to watch right now because he put all the cruiser weights on first on his Nitros, PPV’s and Thunders and that was as late as most of the modern wrestlers could stay up on school nights. The cruiser weights had no story and just high spot after high spot.
Even if Ted had the final say in everything, I think he still would've let Eric go on the massive spending spree that he did. I'm sure Turner would've done whatever it took to take out Vince.
Like I said, Turner was never going to be the one to cancel WCW, since it was the cornerstone of TBS. I just think that all the exec's at AOL Time-Warner just saw WCW as a moneypit at the end of it's run and it was (and I believe still is) hard to sell advertising on wrestling since companies frown upon that demographic. Those two things and wanting to take the network in a different direction, there was no chance for survival. Which is why Eric and Fuscient media was unfortunately able to save WCW.
I think Bischoff is to blame for the oversaturation of PPV's. Whether it would've gone that way regardless, I don't know. But I think the model of having 4-5 a year where you can actually build up to matches that people actually want to pay for is best.