jacobarch
Well-Known Member
No one can be worse than Wells. No one. Even if we pick up a C that is only decent it will still be light years better than Wells.
This is why the Raiders signed KC's Center and not Winewski. So the question really is: Do you pay this guy $5/6 million a year for a few years IF he's had injury issues?
That's kind of what's been the Rams' problem right? I'd hate to see us scramble for another back up, while someone else makes that kind of money.
Stefen Wisniewski NFL Football Statistics | Pro-Football-Reference.com
He's averaged 15 games a season (this surprised me) for his career but he gets these little nagging injuries that limit his effectiveness. He's still just 25, he could be a really good signing.
Ok that's what I like to hear DJ. 25 is a good age for a FA signing no doubt. Perhaps he could stay healthy and have better O-lineman around him in STL. If we can get him for $4 million a year for 3 years, that would be pretty good IMO.
Wells ranked dead last for starting Centers and Joseph was 2nd to last for starting Guards.Yep, I agree that nearly anybody is going to be better than Wells and Joseph. We spent $37 million on Long and Wells and the return was some O-line stability. We could have got that with finding some decent players at a half that and still received the stability we were looking for. Example: Joe Barksdale.