Local skins press

[Sportster 72]

Totally missing the point. Of course our opinions don't always pan out. How about my RGIII position?

The point remains it is wrong to instantly dismiss reports based on nothing more than the sources are unnamed. As these sources have proven to provide accurate information in the past, as we just saw again last week, that should end the debate right there.

I have no clue what your RG3III position is nor do I really care.

Telling someone they are wrong for their opinion is .... your opinion. We might can agree there. I don't have the same standards as dad but I respect him for having it. I will never blindly believe anything that is reported. I have a brain to make my own judgements. I also prefer to chill and let things playout. These guys who are "reporters" are paid to write and report news. They can't wait for things to playout.

I know what and who Dan is to some extent. That isn't going to change. You can bitch and whine all you want (that is a generic YOU) but I have said on more than one occasion you are not going to change the spots on a leopard. He might hide in the bushes for awhile but that ole leopard is always there.

 

[skinsdad62]

Maybe, maybe not. The point is you have instantly dismissed every report from unnamed sources and you have been proven wrong many times. So obviously your theory that they are ALL bogus is simply not true, therefore logic says it's wrong to instantly dismiss them.

Never said all were bogus