Cincyfan78
Well-Known Member
I think it's hard to make the swap in this scenario a 1 for 1 because on the Bengals, Smith is likely a slot. Higgins and Boyd would end up outside, and that means a totally different matchup, IMO. Where Chase is physically strong enough, and fast enough, to play the outside, Smith for the Bengals would be the guy they would use over the middle against softer coverage to utilize his short space ability.My .02 on this is that Burrow is obviously better than Hurts but I do think that if the roles were reversed and Smith ended up on the Bengals and Chase on the Eagles then I think the Chiefs would've swept the Bengals. Ward really didnt do a terrible job covering Chase. Chase was just that good.
Both Chase and Ward had their best games against the Chiefs. Smith had 7 receptions on 10 targets for 122 Yards and 0 Tds mostly against Mike Hughes. Chase had 11 receptions on 12 targets for 266 Yards and 3 Tds against Charvarius Ward. Or at least I assume it was Ward because watching that game give me PTSD. I will say that Ward is a better corner than Hughes.
Devonta Smith will get what the defense gives him. Chase takes what he wants.
Also have to remember, 2 of Chase's big plays were where the Safety did not get over in time to cover on the sideline route, and the missed tackle, poor angles on the come-back route where Chase made the cut and ran away from everyone.
I won't disagree that the outcome of the game(s) may have been different - but I think they would be different for other reasons other than a 1-1 swap of Chase/Smith since I don't think they would be utilized the same.
That's also not taking into consideration the fact that Burrow and Chase do not have a normal 1st year relationship...they have years in the makings already, which no doubt sped things up on the field.