podsox
Well-Known Member
it was nice to see billy lose to a team that does everything he is against
It was definitely a great game.
I think people are just laughing because at one point it seemed like the A's looked like a championship team but then they sold their future to solidify themselves only to lose in the Wild Card game.
Maybe Brad Pitt can star in the sequel to money ball....
One Trade to many!
The A's had a decent staff but Beane just could not let it ride. He had to give away some great young talent and a proven big league power hitter in Cespedes.
I hope A's fans like being a .500 team for the next few years.
I root for 2 other teams behind the Royals. The A's are one of them. Thanks for a great game last night.
Who hasn't had anything resembling a good year offensively since his rookie year in 2012...let's not act like they gave up Miguel Cabrera or something.
22 HRs and 100 RBIs for not a great year is pretty good. Especially when you now have nothing in return for a guy that had another year under contract. While the A's had zero guys end with 100RBIs. Nope couldn't use a proven hitter in that lineup.
Stop shitting on the guy he was a helluva lot better than Moss the second most productive hitter behind Donaldson. Look at the A's record before and after they traded him.
Yes it was a great game but this was the team to beat after the All Star break! They should not even been playing in the wild card game.
It was a fun Ride for a few months. Winning a lot of games with a minute budget.
Beane rolled the dice to counter the mighty Tigers from the off season to trade deadline moves. Johnson blew up in his face (no pun) and the starting pitching moves didn't work. I was optimistic. But, the collapse was ultimately finished last night.
Deserve all the lols they get if that's your thing.
Go Royals, beat LAA
22 HRs and 100 RBIs for not a great year is pretty good. Especially when you now have nothing in return for a guy that had another year under contract. While the A's had zero guys end with 100RBIs. Nope couldn't use a proven hitter in that lineup.
Stop shitting on the guy he was a helluva lot better than Moss the second most productive hitter behind Donaldson. Look at the A's record before and after they traded him.
Yes it was a great game but this was the team to beat after the All Star break! They should not even been playing in the wild card game.
it was nice to see billy lose to a team that does everything he is against
Why laugh at a team that spent money and rewarded the fans with a decent team.
They did exactly the right things.
But, baseball is a tough sport. Even the best teams lose 62-69 games.
I applaud them for "going for it".
They were not going to resign some of the assets they traded regardless.
GREAT SEASON OAKLAND.
That was an epic game that all baseball fans should thank you for giving us.
One thing that A's fans will always have is pride in not being all over the map bandwagon front running fans.
Pride in your team even after a collapse >>>>>>>>
frontrunning teams all over the continental US map
Thanks for the season A's and thanks for trying at magic Beane.
A's aren't going anywhere. Parker and Griffin are coming back.
Give me a break....
Here are the numbers at the time Cespedes was traded:
Cespedes - .256 AVG, .767 OPS
Crisp - .274 AVG, .789 OPS
Donaldson - .247 AVG, .797 OPS
Moss - .259 AVG, .842 OPS
Norris - .300 AVG, .877 OPS
Like I said, Cespedes was their 5th best hitter when he was traded. You're too hung up on a stat that Adrian Gonzalez (years removed from his prime) led the majors in...
This was championship or bust for them and that poor franchise couldn't even get to the ALDS lol
You rented samardzija & Lester for this?
How about a simpler stat wins before the trade and wins after.
Donaldson lost his protection in the order. Although his BA was low he had power. The bottom line is it was a trade the A's should not have made.
The Lester move was unnecessary imo. They had enough pitching already.
It's always funny to see teams make these championship or bust moves in the middle of the season only to lay a big fat egg in the playoffs
How about a simpler stat wins before the trade and wins after.
There are so many factors that go into the game that you can't simply pin wins and losses based on one player in the lineup to draw a causation effect. For example, the gave up more runs in August than any other month prior. ...how much of that do we attribute to losing Cespedes?
If you're going to claim Donaldson lost his protection, explain this:
-Donaldson before Aug 1 - .247 AVG, .797 OPS
-Donaldson Aug/Sept - .271 AVG, .800 OPS
So you could make the case he hit better the last two months of the season without Cespedes...not to mention, his worst month of the season was May, when Cespedes was still with the team. That doesn't jive with what your claiming about the benefit of Cespedes' protection.