Mike Trout 2 years ago hit 30 HR and 83 RBI while striking out 139 times and only walking 67 times. Granted that was his first year playing. His best hitting stat was he hit 326.
Abreu is on pace to beat every one of those numbers except average.
What makes Mike Trout so valuable is that he is good at everything (the perfect 5 tool player). But there are a good 10-15 players who are just as good if not better at batting alone.
I was (like people in the Sox organization) are comparing the 2 at hitting alone. Obviously a lot of people are going to disagree with it. It is a bold statement. And Abreu has only played almost a month so far. But people within the organization who have seen him hit for years in lower levels say he has the potential to be a sensational hitter. One of the best in the game. They don't make this shit up. It has a fair chance at happening.
a couple things:
Trout batted primarily leadoff in 2012. 138 games batting leadoff. 1 game batting 5th. 83 RBI's for a leadoff guy is actually kind of a lot. Care to tell me how guys ever knocked in 100+ runs batting leadoff? And Trout led the entire league in runs scored (129) by a wide margin (Miggy had the 2nd most at 109).
Trout had a .399 OBP in his rookie year. Abreu's currently sits at .324. 75 points of OBP is huge. Trout led the AL in OPS+ his rookie year (168). Only Posey had a higher OPS+ in 2012 (171). He was 2nd in the entire league last year (179) behind only Miggy (187).
Saying there are at least 10-15 guys better at batting alone than Trout is ridiculous, especially when Trout's easily been a top 5 hitter over the last two years. Please name them so I can laugh at you. Chicago sports fans, lol.
Last edited by a moderator: