Warpath
New Member
We wouldn't be addressing the position for the future until next year regardless. Signing Barnett to a one year deal wouldn't add anything to next year's cap. Not following your logic on either of those points.
We wouldn't be addressing the position for the future until next year regardless. Signing Barnett to a one year deal wouldn't add anything to next year's cap. Not following your logic on either of those points.
They are working to give Rak a new deal regardless.
This defense is screwed if Kehl has to see any extended amount of playing time. It wouldn't be screwed if Barnett was here.
If Kehl was anything but a special teams player, he would have done it by now.
why are we so worried about a guy from the ILB position covering te's ? i like keenan but he hadnt proved a thing in that dept . back-up ilbs had 140 snaps last season
and just how do we know that the current guys on this roster cant do the job just yet ? keenan doesnt have THAT much more experience then anyone left on the roster
what he had was the potential size and athletic ability to match -up against these taller athletic te's today
plus we are looking at a cap situation that shackles us . i am not against signing a barnett but we cant do anything until we settle with carriker and cut him loose or redo wilson or rak .
i think our only real thing we can do is have a younger riley cover te's and get better play from the safety position until next season .
there was talk recently of extending him that is why i mentioned himWilson took a pay cut earlier this off season. So his name is effectively off the table.