- Thread starter
- #1
I agree 100%. He was a bad hire for Brooklyn and a bad hire for BucksI never really understood why anyone wanted him as head coach when he had never even coached one game in the NBA to begin with
I call It losers hiring losersI agree 100%. He was a bad hire for Brooklyn and a bad hire for Bucks
Sad thing is he will probably get another HC gig. They loves them recycled coaches in the associationI call It losers hiring losers
I didn't realize David Aldridge was still around
I didn't realize David Aldridge was still around
I've never heard one person say, "Man, that Jason Kidd, he's a helluva coach."I mean 3.5 out of 4th. It’s like soon as someone is underachieving, they don’t give the guy a chance to get it together, they’ll pull the trigger quick.
I mean 3.5 out of 4th. It’s like soon as someone is underachieving, they don’t give the guy a chance to get it together, they’ll pull the trigger quick.
I call It losers hiring losers
As a player yes - but as a coach - nothing. I respect his game, but sometimes or most of the time the best all time players are the worst coaches. At least he was better than Derek Fisher thoughLoser? NBA champ, 10x all star, 5x all NBA, 4x all def 1st team, rook of year...the list goes on.
As a player yes - but as a coach - nothing. I respect his game, but sometimes or most of the time the best all time players are the worst coaches. At least he was better than Derek Fisher though
How many more years did he deserve? I understand saying this for Fiz as he was with Memphis for barely a year.
Kidd on the other hand was in the 4th year and done basically nothing