jarntt
Well-Known Member
Maybe Im wrong. He just seems to me not to be one of Garretts pets
I have no idea if Garrett has "pets" and if he is one or not, but what the heck does that have to do either way with him being a whiner?
Maybe Im wrong. He just seems to me not to be one of Garretts pets
i think the offense will have to put up at least 50 for us to have any chance of victory
I said maybe I was wrong. It just seems TO ME that Murray is treated differently. He gets benched for 1 fumble. Garrett came out and said he ran out of bounds instead of going for the extra 2 yrds. For some reason, Randell got the first carry of the second half vs the Bears- maybe he pulled a Thurman Thomas and lost his helmet. Maybe he hasnt earned his stripes just yet, I dont know. He is a good player- I didnt say he wasnt. I should have used pouter instead of whiner I guess.
I'm going to be honest. It seems as it you are just trying to make up something, anything to discount Murray, and justify Romo's moronic decision.
110 yards before contact in one game is a bad thing now? He's not Garrett's pet? Wtf does that have to do with anything.
IMHO, Murray has been a true professional. I suggested that he should get more touches since the beginning of the season, and he has done nothing to make me change that thought. I think he has the highest yards per carry of ALL running backs. ALL.
i think the offense will have to put up at least 50 for us to have any chance of victory
Lets run him 35 times each game the rest of the season and see what happens
Yes, because that is what we are saying. Blindly give him the ball a minimum of 35 times regardless of game situation. Perhaps it was just a little perplexing that with such a huge lead and with the running game gashing them consistently our OC, HC and QB saw to it that we ran the ball 7 times in the second half? And his was with a great average in the game and in the 2nd half. i couldn't have been the only one screaming at the tv the whole 2nd half about this could i? Heck, the other team talked about how happy and surprised they were that we stopped running the ball. Doesn't that at least get thru to you guys? Your response to every topic includes an obvious or subtle slant to make sure you protect or deflect blame from Romo. It's OK for you to admit we are a much better team with Murray running more, admit they we absolutely should have ran more last week and STILL say that Romo is good. The two do not have to be mutually exclusive.