evolver115
Garage League
For my part, I'm a little less forgiving of the Penguins' plan in this series. I don't think they've done enough to get Halak off his game. They've gotten some net presence, but it hasn't been consistent enough, and they haven't really wreaked havoc with that presence. They need to bump him, just a little bit, every few shifts. Just drift slowly backward into him. He'll start thinking.
I also don't think they've put together a full 60-minute game, especially defensively. Montreal's a fast team, and they're using it well, but the Penguins need to recognize that and slow them down. And not turn the puck over in the neutral zone or at the blue lines. There's been too much of that in this series for the Penguins, and it's led to goals almost every time.
As far as the Capitals taking more punishment, I think it's simply shock factor. Had the Penguins won this series handily, it would have been viewed as either a flukey upset or the Capitals choking. But because the Canadiens won that series before playing the Penguins, fans are a little more conditioned to the Canadiens maybe actually being legitimate contenders.
Plus Halak has continued to play god-like hockey.
It's a fair assessment. I don't necessarily agree with it, just for the sheer fact that there is only so much you can do to get a goalie off of his game.
IMO, I've seen the Pens increase their net-front traffic by quite a bit since game 2. I just think the Canadiens are doing what they need to by clearing the pens out of the slot and the blue paint, and they are doing it by any means necessary.
As far as the turnovers go... it comes hand in hand with the style of offense the Pens play. Their gameplan is to skate in the offensive zone as much as possible, and wear out the defense. When you are playing your game in the opponent's end as much as they are, you are bound to have odd-man rushes going the other way. Kinda like if you play with fire, you're bound to get burned at some point. The Habs have converted those opportunities more often than not.