MAIZEandBLUE09
Well-Known, and Feared, Member
Yes, there are exceptions to the rule. As stated, Michigan is one of the exceptions to the rule that recruiting rankings generally lead to success.And the scenario you just laid out is extreme and never, ever will happen.
At this point, you're just angry because you can't legitimately make an argument that michigan will be good this year based on recruiting classes. One thing you've completely ignored: Several teams are successful without the benefit of highly-rated recruiting classes, ie. Utah, TCU, Wisconsin, Arizona, etc
What you think should be the case for recruiting class rankings is irrelevant. You're taking a defined set of parameters developed for a ranking and trying to make it entirely subjective. For example, say Ohio State really needs depth at QB, WR, and CB. They go out and fill those needs with 3/4* guys, and none of them pan out. Do they get a high rank for that class since it filled the holes, even though those players didn't even end up working out?
I still maintain that average star ranking is the most important factor, followed by the positions you recruited and how you filled your needs. That was the point of my extreme example, obviously that it would never happen, about LSU.