Good chance team name gets changed per report.

[Rowdy]

I didn’t post this earlier cuz I didn’t like the fact that the commemorative shirt deleted the logo, I mean they didn’t on the poster why on the shirt. Darrell Green was a Redskin And I’m not into white washing history personally nor making money over something inaccurate. I thought there was likely a legal issue regarding the logo on NFL merchandise (likely there might be an issue with policy and the NFL)

But at minimum use another helmet then. I mean, choose your damn lane.

Oh man, they would’ve been better off just not having one imo. They gonna catch hell and should

 

[skinsdad62]

As I said when this name change first took place and people disregarded what I said as a conspiracy theory or such . They are eliminating and rewriting actual history . Last year’s superbowl shit was the same . You bend the knee to wokeism and they will change history to support their lies

 

[Stymietee]

As I said when this name change first took place and people disregarded what I said as a conspiracy theory or such . They are eliminating and rewriting actual history . Last year’s superbowl shit was the same . You bend the knee to wokeism and they will change history to support their lies

Sometimes when I feel a desire for comic relief, I turn to these conversations, or even revisit the old political threads.

Here's what I mean.

History isn't one thing that fits neatly under one unifying or in this case divisive umbrella. There's "Ancient history" "Medieval history" and "Modern history." Within these categories there are sub-groupings to include, "political," "social," "economic," "religious," "diplomatic," "art," "food," plus "science and medical" histories
"Wokeism" simply means being aware, no other application of the term is valid especially in this debate over "Native Americans."

Want proof?? Great! Here ya go!

There was no such thing as "Americans" Native or otherwise before Europeans made it up. ( you'd call it rewriting history) So, debating modern history in this case becomes an euro-centric exercise in hubris as it excludes all else in favor of that particular point of view as its reference.

Now, if folks want to talk about "American" or "Americans" that's fine just as long as it's understood that the topic is about a very time limited, specific group. If the same folks want to include everyone that they' ve historically and summarily excluded, we're going to have to agree on not referencing "Americans" or "American," prior to its creation.

 

[Sportster 72]

Darrell Green was a Redskin, if they can't respect that then fuck them and Josh.

 

[kbso83432]

Come on Josh.....throw us old heads a bone.

 

[skinsdad62]

 

[redskinsfan1963]

i,ll take anything other than the current horseshit one.

 

[gkekoa]

If it is just a name, why was it changed against 99% of your fans?

 

[Stymietee]

Question... what am I describing here?

An unshakable commitment and allegiance to someone or something even when it's harmful or irrational. It can make people "feel" safe and powerful, but it can also blind them to the negative aspects or consequences of their loyalty. It can lead to actions that lack doubt, restraint, or reflection.

 

[skinz2winz]

Darrell Green was a Redskin, if they can't respect that then fuck them and Josh.

Josh Harris & Co have represented Darrell Green like the Champion he is. No reason to knock them for something they have no control over.

 

[Stymietee]

If it is just a name, why was it changed against 99% of your fans?

An old western was playing on the neighborhood bar's television and on the show a man was accused of cattle rustling by 100 ranchers who decided to hang him without trial. Most were sure of what they were about to do some were not so sure and a few were against it, so they decided to take a vote which resulted in 99 in favor and one against. A few days after doing the irreversible harm they all found out that they had hanged an innocent man. Out of the 100, were the 99 right or was it the one who stood alone?

 

[skinsdad62]

An old western was playing on the neighborhood bar's television and on the show a man was accused of cattle rustling by 100 ranchers who decided to hang him without trial. Most were sure of what they were about to do some were not so sure and a few were against it, so they decided to take a vote which resulted in 99 in favor and one against. A few days after doing the irreversible harm they all found out that they had hanged an innocent man. Out of the 100, were the 99 right or was it the one who stood alone?

Hanging and a name change aren’t In the same hemisphere as to being legit .

If it is “ just a name” then why change it to begin with ?

 

[Sportster 72]

Josh Harris & Co have represented Darrell Green like the Champion he is. No reason to knock them for something they have no control over.

I like Josh, I sand by what I said.

 

[Stymietee]

Hanging and a name change aren’t In the same hemisphere as to being legit .

If it is “ just a name” then why change it to begin with ?

Missed the point? ( It's about doing the right thing)
And...
If if was "just a name" you wouldn't, but since it's not... ( See above)

 

[redskinsfan1963]

only changed it cause asshole snyder thought keeping it would cost his cheap ass.

 

[j_y19]

Question... what am I describing here?

An unshakable commitment and allegiance to someone or something even when it's harmful or irrational. It can make people "feel" safe and powerful, but it can also blind them to the negative aspects or consequences of their loyalty. It can lead to actions that lack doubt, restraint, or reflection.

Our current political system! Question is, which side?

 

[Stymietee]

Our current political system! Question is, which side?

Here’s one of my favorite political quotes…

“In politics, there are no permanent friends, no permanent enemies, only permanent interests!”

...And my thoughts on the same

The country and the world would be better off if we exchanged divisive political gamesmanship for our permanent interests; however, that would necessarily mean we change our attitudes to focus on those goals.

 

[Caliskinsfan]

Here’s one of my favorite political quotes…

Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason.

Mark Twain

 

[Sportster 72]

Football discussion, huh?

 

[gkekoa]

An old western was playing on the neighborhood bar's television and on the show a man was accused of cattle rustling by 100 ranchers who decided to hang him without trial. Most were sure of what they were about to do some were not so sure and a few were against it, so they decided to take a vote which resulted in 99 in favor and one against. A few days after doing the irreversible harm they all found out that they had hanged an innocent man. Out of the 100, were the 99 right or was it the one who stood alone?

Nope, right is right.

Changing the name because one person is offended by a word created by the people in which the word describes is not right. As you can see, some people are offended that the name was changed to appease a bunch of white liberals.

So we changed a name because some idiots think it is offensive, but the democrat party keep the name and 90% of the people who democrats once claimed we’re not actually people keep voting for them.