averagejoe
You fell victim to one of the classic blunders.
Wonder if that means the Titans are open to the idea to keep/develop Levis under the new regime?Rumors starting to swirl that Raiders might be interested in moving up to 1.01
Wonder if that means the Titans are open to the idea to keep/develop Levis under the new regime?Rumors starting to swirl that Raiders might be interested in moving up to 1.01
Well if your trading up to number 1, no matter who your picking, the investment required to do so is inherently 'high risk'. If you've got #1, and take him, whatever. If they wait till #6, and he falls to that spot, okay whatever. But trading more assets to get him??. ugghhMy read on the QBs might be a bit different since I'm not too invested in looking at the QBs but Ward looks high risk, high reward and Sanders looks medium risk, low reward. I think they're fairly different prospects.
The 3 QBs that come to mind with Sanders are Tua, Bradford, and Mac Jones.
Whats funny is that the Titans have been here before. They basically traded Goff for Derrick Henry and a bunch of other players that I dont think amounted to a lot. So maybe they do the same thing again.
I seriously don't know why any team with the number 1 pick in this draft would draft a QB.Well if your trading up to number 1, no matter who your picking, the investment required to do so is inherently 'high risk'. If you've got #1, and take him, whatever. If they wait till #6, and he falls to that spot, okay whatever. But trading more assets to get him??. ugghh