• Have something to say? Register Now! and be posting in minutes!

ESPN Article

nmgsc2002

Member
106
0
16
Joined
Aug 22, 2011
Location
Santa Clara
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Not sure if you guys read this article below from ESPN today but thought it was interesting how they are looking at Metrics and saying because of these trends we will struggle to make it past GB. What I found more interesting was what they said about Vernon Davis and blocking. They said he is the worst blocking TE. I always thought of him as being one of the better blockers on the team. Just curious as to all your thoughts on this article and what they said. Its an insider article so I put the link here in case you have that as well as pasted it below.

HTML:
http://insider.espn.go.com/nfl/playoffs/2012/story/_/id/8831864/2012-nfl-playoffs-overrated-offense-short-circuit-san-francisco-49ers



Last season the San Francisco 49ers very nearly took the tried-and-true formula of a tough defense, powerful rushing attack and highly efficient pass offense all the way to a berth in the Super Bowl.

This year, the 49ers still have those same characteristics and have now augmented them with quarterback Colin Kaepernick, whose superb dual-threat talents helped vault San Francisco from 26th in offensive yards per game in 2011 to 11th this season.

With that level of improvement, it would seem like San Francisco should be a hands-down favorite to win the NFC Championship Game and have a strong chance at claiming the Lombardi Trophy.

As compelling a case as this seems to be at first glance, the truth of the matter is the 49ers will need a lot of sudden improvement on offense to even make it out of the NFC divisional round, as the game tape and metrics indicate San Francisco has more than enough trouble spots on that side of the ball to preclude a Super Bowl run this year.


To illustrate this decline, let's start by noting the Niners are the lowest scoring team in the entire NFL playoff tournament.

To be fair, they are only one point behind the Baltimore Ravens and within 22 points of three other playoff clubs, but they are also trending worse than just about every other playoff team.

For proof, consider that in the last five games of the regular season San Francisco scored 121 total points and scored 13 points in two contests.

Denver, New England, Atlanta, Green Bay and Seattle all scored more points in those five games and the Falcons were the only club to have scored fewer than 20 points in a game (and they did that only one time).

Houston and Baltimore were the only playoff teams to score fewer total points in that time frame and yet these teams posted fewer than 13 points only a single time between them.

One of the main reasons San Francisco's offense has faltered is a lack of strong downfield targets in the passing game.

The 49ers do have Michael Crabtree, and his 15.9 vertical YPA on passes from Kaepernick this year indicates he is holding up his end of the long-ball bargain. (Note: vertical passes are aerials thrown 11 or more yards downfield.)

Having noted that, take a look at the YPA totals posted by Randy Moss and Vernon Davis on passes thrown by Kaepernick:

Vernon Davis w/ Kaepernick
Route Depth Comp Att Yds TD Int Pen Pen Yds YPA
Short (1-10 yards) 10 12 59 1 0 0 0 4.9
Medium (11-19 yards) 4 7 84 0 0 0 0 12.0
Deep (20-29 yards) 2 3 49 0 0 0 0 16.3
Bomb (30+ yards) 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0.0
Total 16 25 192 1 0 0 0 7.7
Vertical (11+ yards) 6 13 133 0 0 0 0 10.2
Stretch Vertical (20+ yards) 2 6 49 0 0 0 0 8.2
Randy Moss w/ Kaepernick
Route Depth Comp Att Yds TD Int Pen Pen Yds YPA
Short (1-10 yards) 5 10 47 0 0 1 -10 3.4
Medium (11-19 yards) 7 9 103 0 1 0 0 11.4
Deep (20-29 yards) 2 4 49 1 0 0 0 12.3
Bomb (30+ yards) 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0.0
Total 14 27 199 1 2 1 -10 6.8
Vertical (11+ yards) 9 17 152 1 2 0 0 8.9
Stretch Vertical (20+ yards) 2 8 49 1 1 0 0 6.1
The first item that stands out is each player has a dismal short pass YPA. It really isn't worth it to an offense to throw a pass if the return on the risk is less than 5 YPA and that is the case with each of these players on those types of throws.

The second item is the very low stretch vertical YPA marks by Moss and Davis. A double-digit showing in this category is barely acceptable and neither of these two big-name targets has come close to that level.

The third item of note is how few passes these two have seen at the downfield depth levels. This type of thing is par for the course for Kaepernick, as he has averaged only 8.8 vertical passes in the games he has started this year.

To put that number into perspective, consider that it prorates out to roughly 141 vertical targets over a 16-game period. Since the league median for that metric is usually around 150, it means that Kaepernick is airing the ball out on long passes at a slightly lower-than-average pace. This goes against the idea that he could keep up in a shootout, which is something that could definitely take place given the high-powered state of most of the other offenses in the playoffs.

One factor that is likely impacting the lack of success on downfield throws is the 49ers' faltering run blocking.

[+] Enlarge
Michael Zagaris/San Francisco 49ers/Getty Images
The Niners' run blocking has dropped off late in the season.
This part of the offense fared well during the first half of the season, as San Francisco's run-blockers posted a 52.8 percent good blocking rate (GBR) during that time frame.

GBR measures how often a team gives its ball carriers good blocking (which is very roughly defined as when the offense does not allow the defense to do anything to disrupt a rush attempt). To put that 52.8 percent GBR into perspective, it is just more than 3 percentage points higher than the league-leading 49.6 percent GBR posted by Minnesota in 2011.

The issue for the 49ers is their run blocking hasn't been anywhere near as good over the past eight weeks, as the team's GBR during those contests fell to a 44.9 percent level. That number gets even worse if the measurement is limited to the Week 11-17 contests in which San Francisco managed to post a 43.1 percent GBR.

A big part of the problem here is Davis, as he is one of the worst run blocking tight ends in the league.

The number of mistakes he makes in this area are overwhelming but not limited to his being the master of the very ineffective push block, not finishing his blocks well and sometimes putting his head down when initiating a block. This last item is physically dangerous and has the side benefit of not allowing him to see how to react to where the defender is moving. Davis also looks like he does not want to initiate contact with defenders and that trait may explain a lot of the aforementioned technical issues.

Fullback Bruce Miller is much better than Davis in his willingness to get after a defender but he gets overpowered at the point of attack so often that he really can't be counted on to lead runners through the line of scrimmage. This is almost certainly why the 49ers have been rotating defensive and offensive linemen into the backfield at the fullback position but it really hasn't helped that much since those linemen have not displayed the requisite ability to read the line of scrimmage with a running back's eye. For them it is usually run upfield and hit the first defender who shows up and that often isn't the highest percentage move for the run play called.

Add in the fact guards Mike Iupati and Alex Boone and center Jonathan Goodwin have all seen significant declines in their run blocking over the past eight weeks and it indicates this isn't a matter of just picking up the pace in the backfield and edge blockers.

If all of that wasn't enough, the 49ers also have to deal with the fact their starting kicker, David Akers, had the second worst field goal percentage in the league this year. His struggles of late have been enough of a concern that San Francisco recently added Billy Cundiff to their roster, although Cundiff's five misses in 12 attempts were enough to get him released from the Washington Redskins squad in October.

Put all of these troubling trends together with a defense that gave up 89 points over the last three games of the regular season and it means that San Francisco's future plans are not likely to include a trip to New Orleans for Super Bowl XLVII.
 

tomikcon1971

New Member
6,629
0
0
Joined
Aug 2, 2011
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
We played the 1st, 7th, 9th, 14th, and 17th lowest scoring D's....not to mention 3 division rivals in the last 5 games. Doesn't surprise me scoring was down.
 

49ermann

New Member
252
0
0
Joined
Aug 7, 2011
Location
sacramento
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #3
Good research. Hopefully it proves to be insignificant.
But i have been feeling like our offense is not putting up as many points as i think it should. Maybe the play calling or execution something is off.
 

TobyTyler

New Member
10,871
0
0
Joined
Mar 13, 2012
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
I don't need an article in ESPN to tell me the Niners will struggle against GB.
 

MHSL82

Well-Known Member
16,830
912
113
Joined
Aug 6, 2011
Hoopla Cash
$ 500.92
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
I don't need an article in ESPN to tell me the Niners will struggle against GB.

Yeah, Chicken Little didn't need to see the acorn hit him to know the sky was falling. In fact, if he had seen it was an acorn and not the sky, maybe he wouldn't have gone so paranoid and crazy. Maybe he wouldn't have bet on the apocolype either. ;)
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Jikkle

Well-Known Member
4,612
802
113
Joined
Aug 12, 2011
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
The article is from KC Joyner who said the same thing last season

Why San Fransisco 49ers are playoff pretenders

Football isn't like baseball when it comes to projecting with stats and metrics. Metrics said we were a 8-8 or 9-7 team this season and they were completely wrong.

There are elements to the game that go into winning and losing that metrics just do not measure which is why the common sense metric will always win out.
 

Jikkle

Well-Known Member
4,612
802
113
Joined
Aug 12, 2011
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Great call KC Joyner.

Still to stats and metrics that should tell you the history and past not predict the future.
 

Jikkle

Well-Known Member
4,612
802
113
Joined
Aug 12, 2011
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
What a surprise Joyner picking against us again.

10 reasons the Atlanta Falcons can beat the 49ers

Don't have insider to read the article so can't really say if it's garbage or not but considering he called us playoff pretenders last year and said our offense will hold us back this year I'm sure it's not all that interesting of a read.

Note I'm not saying the Falcons can't beat us just that Joyner is typically an idiot.
 

Bemular

New Member
5,989
0
0
Joined
Mar 6, 2012
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
What a surprise Joyner picking against us again.

10 reasons the Atlanta Falcons can beat the 49ers

Don't have insider to read the article so can't really say if it's garbage or not but considering he called us playoff pretenders last year and said our offense will hold us back this year I'm sure it's not all that interesting of a read.

Note I'm not saying the Falcons can't beat us just that Joyner is typically an idiot.

Gezus! This guys disdain for us is epic! I'm beginning this guys wife ran away with a 49er!!
 

MHSL82

Well-Known Member
16,830
912
113
Joined
Aug 6, 2011
Hoopla Cash
$ 500.92
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Gezus! This guys disdain for us is epic! I'm beginning this guys wife ran away with a 49er!!

Even if I weren't a Niners fan, it's stuff like this, the consistency of prognosticating incorrectly, that would make me root for the Niners. There's a good share against the Falcons, but some of that to me makes more sense than this one. I'm sure there are also ones against the Falcons that don't make sense or go overboard, but KC Joyner has been consistently skeptical and wrong. I can't wait to read why we won't beat the Pats/Ravens.
 

Hangman

Well-Known Member
5,828
617
113
Joined
Aug 9, 2011
Location
Cape Cod
Hoopla Cash
$ 3,152.62
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
he 1972 Miami Dolphins won all 17 games they played that year but they could never defeat a perception problem.

According to pro-football-reference.com, the unbeaten Dolphins were considered a pick 'em selection for their AFC divisional and title games and were underdogs against the Washington Redskins in Super Bowl VII.

The reasons for this lack of respect stemmed from Miami being seen as a team that racked up its unbeaten record against weak competition and it was assumed the Dolphins would falter once they squared off against playoff-caliber opponents.

This year's Atlanta Falcons are not unbeaten but in many ways they look to be in the same boat, as they are considered underdogs against the San Francisco 49ers in the NFC Championship Game.

This is understandable at some level considering that, according to a study done by ESPN Stats & Information, the Falcons had the easiest schedule in the NFL this year. Add that to their late-game collapse against the Seattle Seahawks in the NFC divisional round and the 49ers' dominant win over the Green Bay Packers and it's easy to see why Atlanta has perception issues.

Having noted those, the truth of the matter is there are at least 10 reasons to think that the Falcons will be like the '72 Dolphins and show the world their underdog status is undeserved.

Matty Ice is more than just a cool nickname

The general takeaway from that Seahawks-Falcons game is Seattle's comeback grit, but it should be remembered just as much for Matt Ryan's moxie in driving his team 41 yards in only 23 seconds to set up a game-winning field goal.

This type of occurrence has become second nature for Ryan as, according to pro-football-reference.com, during the regular season he led the Falcons on a game-winning drive (defined as an offensive score in the fourth quarter or overtime that puts the winning team ahead for the last time) on seven occasions this season, a number that ties him with Andrew Luck for best in the league.

The Falcons' ability to dominate top-level secondaries

Roddy Whilte
AP Photo/David GoldmanAtlanta's receivers decimated a talented Seattle secondary.

To get a true sense of just how strong the Falcons' passing offense is, consider that last week Ryan posted an incredibly high 85.4 Total QBR mark against a secondary that has a Pro Bowl free safety (Earl Thomas), a rare shutdown cornerback who has terrific ball hawking skills (eight interceptions) and should have made the Pro Bowl (Richard Sherman), a very good cornerback who has nine picks over the past two seasons (Brandon Browner) and one of the most feared hitters in the NFL (Kam Chancellor). If the Falcons could post great numbers against this group, there isn't a secondary in the NFL that Atlanta should fear.

The 49ers' pass defense may not be as good as is generally thought

San Francisco finished second in the league in passing yards per attempt (6.1) and placed six defensive players on the 2013 Pro Bowl squad, and yet this group ended up finishing 15th in Total QBR allowed to opposing teams. That number indicates this platoon does not fare as well in the area of situational football as their overall numbers indicate.

The game is likely to be a shootout

Atlanta scored 20 or more points in all but two of its games this year and San Francisco allowed 31 or more points in three of its past four games.

That trend points toward this game potentially being a shootout. A game of that nature would favor the Falcons, as they are 6-3 this year in contests in which the other team scores 20 or more points. By contrast, the 49ers are 4-3-1 in games in which the opponent scores 20 or more points. In addition, it should be noted that San Francisco scored fewer than 20 points in five games this year, including two of its past six in total and two of its past three on the road.

Colin Kaepernick tends to struggle when forced to throw the ball often

A shootout doesn't look to favor Kaepernick. He has thrown the ball 30 or more times on three occasions this year and two of those games resulted in his lowest YPA totals of his season.

This is not merely a pro-level trend for Kaepernick, as he had a solid but not spectacular 131.6 passer rating in the 13 games in college in which he threw 30 or more passes. Those mediocre figures were also skewed by a couple of games against creampuff opponents and thus indicate Kaepernick has had very little consistent collegiate/pro success when forced to be a high-volume passer.

Home/road splits

In roughly half a season as an NFL starter and his last two years as a college starter, Kaepernick has been appreciably better at home than on the road.

For proof, check out his home/road splits in that time frame:

Kaepernick Home/Road Splits
Season Home/Away Pass Comp Pass Att Pass Yds YPA TD Int Rush att Rush Yds YPC TD
2012 NFL Home 83 130 1173 9.0 6 1 44 359 8.2 5
2012 NFL Away 70 119 904 7.6 6 3 35 237 6.8 2
2009-10 CFB Home 199 306 2628 8.6 20 2 163 1402 8.6 23
2009-10 CFB Away 165 273 2077 7.6 19 10 173 984 5.7 13
All home -- 282 436 3801 8.7 26 3 207 1761 8.5 28
All away -- 235 392 2981 7.6 25 13 208 1221 5.9 15

That's more than a yard of drop-off in yards per attempt (YPA), a huge increase in interceptions and more than 2 yards of difference in rush yards per carry (YPC).

Those numbers might partially explain why, over the course of his football career, Kaepernick is 21-5 at home and 16-11 on the road. That doesn't bode well for a 49ers club that lost two of its last three road games this season.

Read-option runs are not likely to win this game for San Francisco

The Falcons faced four read-option quarterbacks this year (Cam Newton twice, Robert Griffin III and Russell Wilson) and they allowed that trio to gain 269 yards on 26 rush attempts, numbers that would seem to suggest that the read-option will be a huge problem for Atlanta.

The issue with that assessment is those numbers were mostly compiled via two long gains by Newton (a 32-yard read-option run in Week 4 and a 72-yard read-option touchdown run in Week 14). Take those plays out of the equation and Atlanta gave up 165 rush yards on 24 carries in four games to read-option quarterbacks, so for the most part the Falcons were able to keep this type of running in check.

It should also be noted that prior to his record-setting performance against Green Bay (which was assisted by the Packers' odd defensive game plan and lack of in-game adjustments), Kaepernick's best rushing total of the season was an 84-yard mark against the Rams in Week 13 that was bolstered by a 50-yard scramble. San Francisco's offense has not revolved around Kaepernick's read-option running for most of the year and Atlanta should be able to make sure that doesn't happen this week.

San Francisco gives up a lot of sacks

John Abraham's injury will hurt Atlanta's pass rush but let's not forget that San Francisco ended the year with the third highest sack-allowed percentage in the NFL (8.7). Some of that had to do with the frequent use of single-read plays where Alex Smith didn't have the first receiver open and then couldn't make a play with his feet, but Kaepernick also has a fairly high sack percentage this year. Joe Staley's injury could also impact this matchup and help the Falcons tally a couple of big plays in this category.

Aldon Smith isn't the same without a fully healthy Justin Smith

From Week 4 of the 2011 season through Week 14 of the 2012 season, Aldon Smith had at least one sack in 21 out of 28 games and never went more than two games in a row without a sack.

Over the past four games, he has not posted a single sack and that streak perfectly dovetails with Justin Smith's injury. This pass rush simply isn't the same without these two being able to work together at full speed and Atlanta's pass protection should benefit accordingly.

Atlanta has a significant edge at kicker

This could very well be a close game that comes down to which team can convert a higher percentage of field goals. That factor favors Atlanta since David Akers, San Francisco's specialist in this area, had the second worst field goal percentage among qualifying kickers this year.

Put all 10 of these advantages together and it should be enough to see Atlanta win a game that is just as much a battle for respect as it is for a berth in Super Bowl XLVII.
 

MHSL82

Well-Known Member
16,830
912
113
Joined
Aug 6, 2011
Hoopla Cash
$ 500.92
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
What a surprise Joyner picking against us again.

10 reasons the Atlanta Falcons can beat the 49ers

Don't have insider to read the article so can't really say if it's garbage or not but considering he called us playoff pretenders last year and said our offense will hold us back this year I'm sure it's not all that interesting of a read.

Note I'm not saying the Falcons can't beat us just that Joyner is typically an idiot.

I originally thought it was a comment on Alex, but he repeated it with Kaep and apparently is repeating it after the Packers game. Get fooled once, fine, but again? If it was still Alex Smith or Kaep laid a stinker that the defense won, then fine, but the evidence is stacking against him. I guess he feels he'll eventually be right. If he is, I don't want him or others to ignore that it was the first time he was right, if so. Dumb luck if it happens because of his persistence after being wrong before.
 

MHSL82

Well-Known Member
16,830
912
113
Joined
Aug 6, 2011
Hoopla Cash
$ 500.92
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Having skimmed the article, those reasons if the Niners lose, are ok. But I wouldn't use them to predict.
 

Hangman

Well-Known Member
5,828
617
113
Joined
Aug 9, 2011
Location
Cape Cod
Hoopla Cash
$ 3,152.62
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Wow this author is grasping at straws
 

MHSL82

Well-Known Member
16,830
912
113
Joined
Aug 6, 2011
Hoopla Cash
$ 500.92
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Wow this author is grasping at straws

Yep, if we lose, he gave enough options of blame that he could hang on one of them. He didn't really predict, he acted like well, these are just the numbers and they could happen. If they do, I bet he'll feel like he predicted it. If it doesn't, then he'll just feel that was giving possibilities.
 

Bemular

New Member
5,989
0
0
Joined
Mar 6, 2012
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Even if I weren't a Niners fan, it's stuff like this, the consistency of prognosticating incorrectly, that would make me root for the Niners. There's a good share against the Falcons, but some of that to me makes more sense than this one. I'm sure there are also ones against the Falcons that don't make sense or go overboard, but KC Joyner has been consistently skeptical and wrong. I can't wait to read why we won't beat the Pats/Ravens.

Yeah, at some point it just becomes emotional drivel with these guys. I have looked at this match-up in many different ways and I gotta agree with whomever said a few days ago - this is our game to lose.
 

dredinis21

Swollen Member
3,398
211
63
Joined
Aug 12, 2011
Location
Los Angeles
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
To single out our secondary without taking our pass rush into consideration is silly. To not mention that between Willis and Bowman, we have possibly the only two ILB in the league quick and explosive enough to man up on Gonzalez is shoddy journalistic work. To minimize the strength of our OL when the Falcons' best pass rusher is "hoping" to play is stupid. To negate long runs by Newton, something that Kaep has shown a penchant for doing, in order to make a half-assed case about how read option QBs are only mildly successful vs ATL is completely asinine.

This entire article sounds as if he is trying to convince himself that the Falcons have more then a puncher's chance against the Niners. Which they don't. If the Niners turn the ball over and the Falcons play four solid quarters with all three phases, then maybe. But to try to dissect the league's best defense over the past two seasons as if there are holes to exploit is silly. The only teams that have given the Niners problems are teams with big powerful RBs and strong OL. Michael Turner isn't even in the ballpark of Stephen Jackson/Marshawn Lynch and their OL, although not terrible, is not terribly physical either.

Like B said, this game is the Niners to lose. Joyner's girl must have f**ked one of the Niners a couple years ago because otherwise, this article makes no sense.
 

Jikkle

Well-Known Member
4,612
802
113
Joined
Aug 12, 2011
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Grasping at straws is right and he's shaping up to be the Micheal Moore of sports writing.

I want to stress that the Falcons are fully capable of beating us so what follows isn't meant to dismiss the Falcons but to poke holes in Joyner's reasoning.

Matty Ice is more than just a cool nickname

Fair point but this really only applies if the Falcons are in position to win it at the end. If Seattle takes one more play to score that TD then you're talking about how Matty Ice choked away the game.

The Falcons' ability to dominate top-level secondaries

Eh I'll give him this one but not a fan of using one team as an example. I mean I could bring up the Cardinal game where he threw 5 INTs and didn't dominate squat but his body of work is sound.

The problem with this point is no mention of the pass rush. Any QB can dominate an excellent secondary if you give them enough time and in this game unless his offensive line is standing on it's head he's likely to get hurried, pressured, and sacked.

The 49ers' pass defense may not be as good as is generally thought

Well guess it depends on what you thought of them in the first place but overall they are a pretty solid group.

Joyner you do realize they played Rodgers twice, Stafford, Brees, Eli Manning, Tom Brady, and heck you can even through in Russell Wilson in there. Were you seriously expecting them to completely lock all those guys down?

The game is likely to be a shootout
San Francisco allowed 31 or more points in three of its past four games.

This is why it's hard to take you stat heads seriously sometimes because it makes me wonder if you watch the game or just read the box scores and stats. The 9ers defense did not give up 31 points against the Packers as 7 of those points came off of a pick 6 and another 7 you could argue was just a garbage time TD. So the statement is factual correct but some context should be applied to it.

But it's still a fair point in that odds are likely a shootout favors the Falcons but the 9ers have shown they can win shootouts as well.

Colin Kaepernick tends to struggle when forced to throw the ball often

For starters why the college stats? He's in the NFL and what he did in college isn't relevant because it's completely different situations.

To the point it's why I call him Joyner Micheal Moore. It's not a false statement but one you can interpret in different ways. The 9ers goal is a balanced offense of running and passing the ball. If CK is having to throw the ball a lot it's typically because we're down by 2 scores and we need to catch up. It's not a case where the offense is built around passing like a Patriots or Packers offense.

Home/road splits

Again I don't really care about what he did in college.

And news flash QBs aren't as good on the road as they are at home wow that was insightful.

Also you do realize won at New Orleans and at New England in December? He did lose to Seattle which is a tough place to play especially right after playing at New England and the Rams which the Rams somehow built the counter defense to everyone in the NFC West because no NFC West team did well against them.

Read-option runs are not likely to win this game for San Francisco

Look it's not going to carry the day like it did against Green Bay but what a weak argument to suggest Atlanta basically stopped except for a couple of long runs. I mean how stupid would I sound if I said Seattle basically shut down the Falcons passing game if it wasn't for a couple of long passes?

Not to mention CK is faster then Newton and Wilson and the read option we run is a little more complex.

San Francisco gives up a lot of sacks

Terrible point that again makes you wonder if he watches the games or just reads stats. CK took a lot of sacks early but since week 15 against New England he's had just 1 sack a game. So that's 4 straight weeks with just 1 sack a game and that's what I would call a trend.

Aldon Smith isn't the same without a fully healthy Justin Smith

Fair but they did get a lot of pressure on Rodgers. The only reason the sack numbers weren't high is because Rodgers was getting rid of the ball quickly like he did the first game.

Also weren't you just trying to sell me on the Falcons being able to get sacks with a hobbled John Abraham but now dismissing the 9ers pass rush because of a less then 100% Justin Smith?

Atlanta has a significant edge at kicker

Fair but Akers kicking struggles are due to something physical so it's going to depend largely on his health. If Akers is healthy then I believe he'll kick just fine but if not then yea the kicking game could be in the Falcons favor.
 

MHSL82

Well-Known Member
16,830
912
113
Joined
Aug 6, 2011
Hoopla Cash
$ 500.92
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
First of all, the bolded is my all-time favorite quote of yours. Funny and to the point. Good job.

Matty Ice is more than just a cool nickname

Fair point but this really only applies if the Falcons are in position to win it at the end. If Seattle takes one more play to score that TD then you're talking about how Matty Ice choked away the game.

I have said before that an almost loss is not a loss any more than an almost win is not a win. They deserve credit for winning, but your comment is spot on. Someone said Lynch's TD in retrospect cost them the game - which is a bit stretched, but the point is there, one more play and there would likely be a timeout and time off the clock. Perhaps, Ryan and the Seattle defense would pull a Flacco and Moore, but unlikely.

The Falcons' ability to dominate top-level secondaries

Eh I'll give him this one but not a fan of using one team as an example. I mean I could bring up the Cardinal game where he threw 5 INTs and didn't dominate squat but his body of work is sound.

As you see, some people have selective memories, short memories, or don't know what they are talking about. Ryan escaped blame for that game because of the defense winning it for them. I think he lost the chance to be in the running for the MVP due to that game, steam ran out, but still, good fortune for him (not for the defense, as they earned it). Therefore the team deserved the win because the defense is part of the team, but Ryan seemed to get off easy. He has backed up his play in other games, though so he does deserve some slack, just not amnesia from Joyner on his play against top-level secondaries.

The game is likely to be a shootout
San Francisco allowed 31 or more points in three of its past four games.

This is why it's hard to take you stat heads seriously sometimes because it makes me wonder if you watch the game or just read the box scores and stats. The 9ers defense did not give up 31 points against the Packers as 7 of those points came off of a pick 6 and another 7 you could argue was just a garbage time TD. So the statement is factual correct but some context should be applied to it.

Plus, I only consider a shootout when both teams are close and scoring a lot. When Seattle blew us out, I swear some of their scores were well-after a shootout, as in not relevant to the game and therefore the extra scores don't make it a shootout. The over-31 is of course, true. A 30 point game would have won it handedly, 14 would have clinched it (assuming we didn't score more being so close). The 31 cut off was not relevant. The Seattle game was not a shootout, it was a blowout. The New England game, we won. The Green Bay we won - not a shootout, but we won. Why say the word shootout when only one game was and we won it? Then go on numbers that aren't shootouts? The way some stretch, I wouldn't have been surprised if he said we only won because of the rain against New England or that the GB punt fumble was the winner.

Read-option runs are not likely to win this game for San Francisco

Look it's not going to carry the day like it did against Green Bay but what a weak argument to suggest Atlanta basically stopped except for a couple of long runs. I mean how stupid would I sound if I said Seattle basically shut down the Falcons passing game if it wasn't for a couple of long passes?

As said earlier. Best quote ever.

San Francisco gives up a lot of sacks

Terrible point that again makes you wonder if he watches the games or just reads stats. CK took a lot of sacks early but since week 15 against New England he's had just 1 sack a game. So that's 4 straight weeks with just 1 sack a game and that's what I would call a trend.

I like the underlined as well.

Atlanta has a significant edge at kicker

Fair but Akers kicking struggles are due to something physical so it's going to depend largely on his health. If Akers is healthy then I believe he'll kick just fine but if not then yea the kicking game could be in the Falcons favor.

Maybe regular season wise, but methinks that he is ignoring that the kicker missed during the timeout call. Yes, it didn't count, but he was trying and had no legitimate reason to know/think it wouldn't count. He choked and had a second chance. There's no such thing as a kick you miss on purpose because of a known TO call. Yes, I count that against him when considering if he's clutch. He made 1 out of 2. He had a practice. He had a mulligan.
 

Jikkle

Well-Known Member
4,612
802
113
Joined
Aug 12, 2011
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Let's see how you did Joyner

Matty Ice is more than just a cool nickname

Looks like it was just a cool nickname

The Falcons' ability to dominate top-level secondaries

Looks like you won that one

The 49ers' pass defense may not be as good as is generally thought

I'll score you half a point. We still have a good pass defense it's just Atlanta has really good weapons.

The game is likely to be a shootout

Wasn't a shootout so wrong on this one KC

Colin Kaepernick tends to struggle when forced to throw the ball often

Well he didn't have to throw the ball often but he did throw the ball quite well and I would say if he had to throw the ball often it still would've been quite well.

Home/road splits

Went down 17-0 and after the first two drives we didn't punt so bzzzt on you Joyner

Read-option runs are not likely to win this game for San Francisco

Wrong. It just wasn't CK keeping it on the option that won the game but Gore and LMJ.

San Francisco gives up a lot of sacks

1 sack............

Aldon Smith isn't the same without a fully healthy Justin Smith

I suppose I'll give you this one but I think it's more due to a bagged up Aldon Smith

Atlanta has a significant edge at kicker

Akers missed his only chance so you're right but kicking wasn't a factor in this game
 
Top