Game Thread: eagles vs commies part DEW

[Sportster 72]

Wow!!

 

[duke1861]

Great play by falco !!

YESS!!!! What a win!!!!! Hey duke are we still a bad team????

Yes....but it is better to be lucky than good.

You know just as well as I do that we got very lucky there. Hats off to the defense, but several breaks had to go our way to win and they did.

Looks like your boy Wentz isn't needed anymore right Dean? We are very fortunate to get the win and I would have to believe Philly wins 9 out of 10 times...but not this time.

And stop fake celebrating...you wanted Falco to fail so Wentz could get his job back.

 

[Sportster 72]

Yes....but it is better to be lucky than good.

You know just as well as I do that we got very lucky there. Hats off to the defense, but several breaks had to go our way to win and they did.

Looks like your boy Wentz isn't needed anymore right Dean? We are very fortunate to get the win and I would have to believe Philly wins 9 out of 10 times...but not this time.

And stop fake celebrating...you wanted Falco to fail so Wentz could get his job back.

No one said a thing about Wentz but you. Stick to the game.

 

[duke1861]

No one said a thing about Wentz but you. Stick to the game.

Dean did. You said you don't read Dean right?

 

[Sportster 72]

I did that time because I knew you would be the first one to bring up Wentz .... after a really good victory.

"YESS!!!! What a win!!!!! Hey duke are we still a bad team????"

It seems you are more interested in being right than winning a game.

 

[duke1861]

I did that time because I knew you would be the first one to bring up Wentz .... after a really good victory.

"YESS!!!! What a win!!!!! Hey duke are we still a bad team????"

It seems you are more interested in being right than winning a game.

That was NOT a good victory..come on. It counts yes...but Philly played uncharacteristically bad and the missed facemask was the call that turned the game in the favor of WSH. There were bad calls both ways, but the two biggest botched calls (late hit out of bounce and the missed facemask which caused the fumble) went against Philly. The defense played fantastic, but ignoring the facemask and fumble is irresponsible.

Dean has been running his mouth about Falco for over a month now and claims Falco is NOT a starter here or the league. He then fake celebrates when the team wins. I was asked a direct question and responded correct? I don't recall you being a part of that conversation. Seems like you are looking to start an argument when you were not being addressed in any manner at all.

 

[chillerdab]

That was NOT a good victory..come on. It counts yes...but Philly played uncharacteristically bad and the missed facemask was the call that turned the game in the favor of WSH. There were bad calls both ways, but the two biggest botched calls were against WSH. The defense played fantastic, but ignoring the facemask and fumble is irresponsible.

Dean has been running his mouth about Falco for over a month now and claims Falco is NOT a starter. He then fake celebrates when the team wins. I was asked a question and responded correct? I don't recall you being apart of that conversation.

Disagree with this, to some extent.

The commanders bludgeoned the sheagles in the first half. TH made some great throws, and all phases of the game played their best game of the season.

They got a lucky break on the facemask play, but caused a fumble on the ling reception, and the Sheagles were correctly penalized for hitting TH in the head.

Hell, last week we lost to the vikings and mediocre quarterback Kirk Cousins because of a lame penalty on an extra point.

Shit happens.

 

[duke1861]

Disagree with this, to some extent.

The commanders bludgeoned the sheagles in the first half. TH made some great throws, and all phases of the game played their best game of the season.

They got a lucky break on the facemask play, but caused a fumble on the ling reception, and the Sheagles were correctly penalized for hitting TH in the head.

Hell, last week we lost to the vikings and mediocre quarterback Kirk Cousins because of a lame penalty on an extra point.

Shit happens.

The fact is that Dean confronted me and I responded. Sportster then tried to get involved for no reason.

It is my opinion if I don't think this is a good victory. My remarks are mostly aimed at Dean and then to Sportster. Bad calls went both ways, but the late hit out of bounce to extend the drive and the facemask were huge turning points IMO. That is all I am trying to say. It is a victory yes, but it is simply an opinion if it's a "good victory". I hate wins that involve massive ref blunders.

I brought up Wentz because Dean has continually made backhanded comments about Falco and then shows up at the end to celebrate the "big win". It is all fake to me and I am going to call it out.

 

[Sportster 72]

That was NOT a good victory..come on. It counts yes...but Philly played uncharacteristically bad and the missed facemask was the call that turned the game in the favor of WSH. There were bad calls both ways, but the two biggest botched calls were against WSH. The defense played fantastic, but ignoring the facemask and fumble is irresponsible.

Dean has been running his mouth about Falco for over a month now and claims Falco is NOT a starter. He then fake celebrates when the team wins. I was asked a question and responded correct? I don't recall you being apart of that conversation.

All I said is "why did you bring Wentz into the conversation." YOU were the one who did that.

A week or so ago you said I was attacking you and wanted me to put you on ignore but you and dean do it all the time. Everyone on this board knows you don't like Wentz. It is pretty clear you are more interested in being right than winning.

Silly me, I was just happy to see the team win. I don't care if Elmer Fudd was the QB.

 

[duke1861]

All I said is "why did you bring Wentz into the conversation." YOU were the one who did that.

A week or so ago you said I was attacking you and wanted me to put you on ignore but you and dean do it all the time. Everyone on this board knows you don't like Wentz. It is pretty clear you are more interested in being right than winning.

Silly me, I was just happy to see the team win. I don't care if Elmer Fudd was the QB.

I think it was pretty clear that this was a conversation between Dean and I and you got involved. You claim to not read Dean and then magically start to do so just for tonight?

I have a lot of conversations with folks on here. I have for years...since the ESPN days. The two people who continually attempt to debate me on just about every post are you and Dean. I seldom if EVER address you unless it is something funny or to get a laugh. I have learned that talking football with you is a waste of time. I actually have more productive conversations with Cowboys posters to be honest.

 

[chillerdab]

Not gonna get involed with sportster and dean. Just gonna enjoy the win.

You do you.

 

[duke1861]

Not gonna get involed with sportster and dean. Just gonna enjoy the win.

You do you.

One day I will avoid the landmine....I am a slow learner...LOL

 

[skinsdad62]

It’s a great win

 

[skinsdad62]

 

[Sportster 72]

I think it was pretty clear that this was a conversation between Dean and I and you got involved. You claim to not read Dean and then magically start to do so just for tonight?

I have a lot of conversations with folks on here. I have for years...since the ESPN days. The two people who continually attempt to debate me on just about every post are you and Dean. I seldom if EVER address you unless it is something funny or to get a laugh. I have learned that talking football with you is a waste of time. I actually have more productive conversations with Cowboys posters to be honest.

Anytime you want to say more than:

RR sucks
Wentz sucks
Turner sucks

Let me know. I have yet you to see you talk scheme, X's and O's etc. You are the same one that said you knew what you were talking about because Irsay and Reich said it and that Reich and Pederson where great offensive coaches. Please!!

Like I said, I was pretty sure you would be the first one to bring up Wentz because you have done it for 7 or 8 months ....

Like you I can post anything I want on this board. I don't have to agree with you.

See you next week

 

[DJ Fieri]

Washington and 10.5 points.

BOOM.

 

[deanpet21]

Yes....but it is better to be lucky than good.

You know just as well as I do that we got very lucky there. Hats off to the defense, but several breaks had to go our way to win and they did.

Looks like your boy Wentz isn't needed anymore right Dean? We are very fortunate to get the win and I would have to believe Philly wins 9 out of 10 times...but not this time.

And stop fake celebrating...you wanted Falco to fail so Wentz could get his job back.

You still believe we are a bad team? that is amazing. Of Course, Wentz is needed. The defense, running game, and Joey Slye won the game for us.

 

[duke1861]

Anytime you want to say more than:

RR sucks
Wentz sucks
Turner sucks

Let me know. I have yet you to see you talk scheme, X's and O's etc. You are the same one that said you knew what you were talking about because Irsay and Reich said it and that Reich and Pederson where great offensive coaches. Please!!

Like I said, I was pretty sure you would be the first one to bring up Wentz because you have done it for 7 or 8 months ....

Like you I can post anything I want on this board. I don't have to agree with you.

See you next week

I have been here longer than you, so you wouldn't know what I have talked about. You even admitted you didn't post on the ESPN board. I know you follow me around, but yes, I talk schemes and long-term strategy all the time. Feel free to ask around here or on the DAL board.

Pederson and Reich have Super Bowls, so yes, I believe they are good offensive coaches. Better than Turner...that is for sure. You were the one that said we should "wait and see" with Rivera. I said from the get-go it was a bad idea. I am a pretty respected poster on several boards. It is actually kinda weird that you followed me to the DAL board.

You are a lot more obsessed with what I post that the other way around. I could not care less what you post as it bores me, is unoriginal, and is not worth my time. Not trying to be rude...just be honest.

Just because I don't talk about games or players from 60 years ago that nobody cares about doesn't mean I don't know what I am talking about. Again, I am trying to keep the peace here and be an adult so I suggest we ignore each other for the good of the board. Sound good?

 

[Sportster 72]

I have been here longer than you, so you wouldn't know what I have talked about. You even admitted you didn't post on the ESPN board. I know you follow me around, but yes, I talk schemes and long-term strategy all the time. Feel free to ask around here or on the DAL board.

Pederson and Reich have Super Bowls, so yes, I believe they are good offensive coaches. Better than Turner...that is for sure. You were the one that said we should "wait and see" with Rivera. I said from the get-go it was a bad idea. I am a pretty respected poster on several boards. It is actually kinda weird that you followed me to the DAL board.

You are a lot more obsessed with what I post that the other way around. I could not care less what you post as it bores me, is unoriginal, and is not worth my time. Not trying to be rude...just be honest.

Just because I don't talk about games or players from 60 years ago that nobody cares about doesn't mean I don't know what I am talking about. Again, I am trying to keep the peace here and be an adult so I suggest we ignore each other for the good of the board. Sound good?

Wrong again ... I have been around since the ESPN days. I was one of the ones along with shark advocating not to draft Griffin.

Not obsessed with you at all. You repeat the same posts over and over and over and over. People from other boards see it when I say things like "so what you are saying is you don't like Wentz" etc.

Anytime you want to have a football discussion about X's and O's I am game. I played, i have coached. Just let me know.

If you want to ignore me, then help yourself. Have a good day.

 

[duke1861]

Wrong again ... I have been around since the ESPN days. I was one of the ones along with shark advocating not to draft Griffin.

Not obsessed with you at all. You repeat the same posts over and over and over and over. People from other boards see it when I say things like "so what you are saying is you don't like Wentz" etc.

Anytime you want to have a football discussion about X's and O's I am game. I played, i have coached. Just let me know.

If you want to ignore me, then help yourself. Have a good day.

I was quoting you when you said that. I was there way before that with Gkekoa, Skinsdad, David Bovey, Shark, and Goldy. Ask anybody. If anyone can post what they want, why do you care if it is repetitive? It would be nice if you kept your story straight.

Not interested in having X and O discussions with you...I quite frankly don't care and I doubt anyone else does to be honest. I have said that before...and I thought we had covered that?