- Thread starter
- #1
RP-29
xⁿ
The days of winning four straight Cups or 5 in 7 years are dead. Free agency, over-expansion and the salary cap have murdered the possibility of that ever happening again. In fact, it's been almost 20 years since a team won back-to-back Cups.
So the question is... should we...
So the question is... should we...
- simply archive the word "dynasty" along with wooden sticks and helmetless players?
- evolve its meaning/criteria to fit today's NHL?
- If we evolve it, what are the new criteria for being a dynasty?
- Under that new criteria, do any teams since Gretzky's Oilers qualify?
- If we evolve it, what are the new criteria for being a dynasty?