- Thread starter
- #341
Look for one of the 2 UCLA defenders to be picked at 61 if we stay put
I wouldn't mind CB as the next pick. BPA is a good position to be picking at. It avoids reaching for players.Consensus appears that AP will go BPA (Esp in round 2 considering value here) and that there remains quite a lot of talent that would bolster our team in quite a few areas, agree Edge is a need.
Not so sure on this but maybe if BPA or in lower rounds, other needs as you mentioned appear (at least to me) as more critical (Edge, CB, RB)or WR added in this draft to keep building the offense.
AgreedConsensus appears that AP will go BPA (Esp in round 2 considering value here) and that there remains quite a lot of talent that would bolster our team in quite a few areas, agree Edge is a need.
If it's close in talent level. I am sure there is some factoring in of position needs.Not so sure on this but maybe if BPA or in lower rounds, other needs as you mentioned appear (at least to me) as more critical (Edge, CB, RB)
I don't disagree at all, just noting there is some depth at that position, albeit no one who is a young elite talentIf it's close in talent level. I am sure there is some factoring in of position needs.
Depth pick? He will start from day 1.
I buy this argument
I don't care about 'what if' tbh - I'll leave that to you and othersbut what would have happened if we didnt make the Tunsil trade?
The turnover on Washington's offensive line over the last two years is crazy
January 1, 2024
LT: Cornelius Lucas
LG: Saahdiq Charles
C: Nick Gates
RG: Sam Cosmi
RT: Andrew Wylie
January 1, 2025
LT: Brandon Coleman
LG: Nick Allegretti
C: Tyler Biadasz
RG: Sam Cosmi
RT: Andrew Wylie
April 25, 2025
LT: Laremy Tunsil
LG: Brandon Coleman
C: Tyler Biadasz
RG: Sam Cosmi
RT: Josh Conerly Jr.
Adam Peters has completely rebuilt this line from what it was just two years ago
#RaiseHail![]()