Draft efficiency vs draft capital

[chillerdab]

Now that I’ve been researching counterpoints for all the chicken little crybabies on this message board regarding the commanders drafting, I stumbled upon this little gem of a website that compares drafting efficiency:

NFL Drafting Efficiency, 2010-2019

Guest columnist Benjamin Ellinger breaks down every draft pick in the past 10 years. Did Cleveland's tanking policy pay off? Which teams had the best results in the draft, and which wasted their picks? And is there anything meaningful in this data, or is there really some skill involved? The...

www.footballoutsiders.com

It’s a long article and not a soundbyte, and thus might turn off the shallow-minded among us, but in short, it seems to suggest that Washington, when comparing draft return (how well the washington team has drafted tabulated in career annual value) with draft capital (what actual draft picks they had to work with) has drafted 9th out of THE ENTIRE NFL over a ten year period ending in 2019.

Should I continue to research, naysayers?!

Suck it.

 

[Buffalo_Nickel_1]

Now that I’ve been researching counterpoints for all the chicken little crybabies on this message board regarding the commanders drafting, I stumbled upon this little gem of a website that compares drafting efficiency:

NFL Drafting Efficiency, 2010-2019

Guest columnist Benjamin Ellinger breaks down every draft pick in the past 10 years. Did Cleveland's tanking policy pay off? Which teams had the best results in the draft, and which wasted their picks? And is there anything meaningful in this data, or is there really some skill involved? The...

www.footballoutsiders.com

It’s a long article and not a soundbyte, and thus might turn off the shallow-minded among us, but in short, it seems to suggest that Washington, when comparing draft return (how well the washington team has drafted tabulated in career annual value) with draft capital (what actual draft picks they had to work with) has drafted 9th out of THE ENTIRE NFL over a ten year period ending in 2019.

Should I continue to research, naysayers?!

Suck it.

The people who hate the name change will keep hating till they start winning the people who moved on will see this draft different.. this is good info my opinion we just need a franchise QB

 

[Buffalo_Nickel_1]

I think there is going be alot of bust in this draft because of the portal guys. But Washington stayed away from them and selected 4 to 5 year starters... when i mean portal guys I mean players that went to a school then to another school I like to see that data 4 year players vs player hoppers.. this is it for the portal guys if they struggle will they work or give up there is no portal in NFL it's either work hard or get the F out

 

[j_y19]

Now that I’ve been researching counterpoints for all the chicken little crybabies on this message board regarding the commanders drafting, I stumbled upon this little gem of a website that compares drafting efficiency:

NFL Drafting Efficiency, 2010-2019

Guest columnist Benjamin Ellinger breaks down every draft pick in the past 10 years. Did Cleveland's tanking policy pay off? Which teams had the best results in the draft, and which wasted their picks? And is there anything meaningful in this data, or is there really some skill involved? The...

www.footballoutsiders.com

It’s a long article and not a soundbyte, and thus might turn off the shallow-minded among us, but in short, it seems to suggest that Washington, when comparing draft return (how well the washington team has drafted tabulated in career annual value) with draft capital (what actual draft picks they had to work with) has drafted 9th out of THE ENTIRE NFL over a ten year period ending in 2019.

Should I continue to research, naysayers?!

Suck it.

Great. So what happened?

 

[Skin'EmAll]

So if the drafting was decent, who's the problem in D.C.?

 

[Buffalo_Nickel_1]

So if the drafting was decent, who's the problem in D.C.?

Media outlets

 

[chillerdab]

Great. So what happened?

Snyder, Allen, Gruden, Manusky, Shanahan, RG3, scandals, more scandals ,off-the-field concerns, more scandals, etc. etc. etc.

 

[skinsdad62]

Now that I’ve been researching counterpoints for all the chicken little crybabies on this message board regarding the commanders drafting, I stumbled upon this little gem of a website that compares drafting efficiency:

NFL Drafting Efficiency, 2010-2019

Guest columnist Benjamin Ellinger breaks down every draft pick in the past 10 years. Did Cleveland's tanking policy pay off? Which teams had the best results in the draft, and which wasted their picks? And is there anything meaningful in this data, or is there really some skill involved? The...

www.footballoutsiders.com

It’s a long article and not a soundbyte, and thus might turn off the shallow-minded among us, but in short, it seems to suggest that Washington, when comparing draft return (how well the washington team has drafted tabulated in career annual value) with draft capital (what actual draft picks they had to work with) has drafted 9th out of THE ENTIRE NFL over a ten year period ending in 2019.

Should I continue to research, naysayers?!

Suck it.

and exactly what did our record indicate over that time again ? sub 500 ? makes me believe that the article wasnt worth the paper it was written on

 

[chillerdab]

and exactly what did our record indicate over that time again ? sub 500 ? makes me believe that the article wasnt worth the paper it was written on

Sure, because everybody knows that the only thing needed to ensure success on the field is if players are drafted at their appropriate draft round, right skinsdad?

Success on the field has literally NOTHING to do with things like: quality coaching, ample upgraded training facilities, franchise stability, owner interference, perpetual off the field issues, etc…

 

[chillerdab]

Also, skinsdad, how do you suppose you account for fhe teams ahead of the redskins generally being perennial contenders, if the article isnt worth anything?

Teams ahead of washington include the following, in order: seattle, GB, Dallas, Pitt, NO, Balt, KC, and NE?

Oh that’s right? You cant.

Research is fun.

 

[skinsdad62]

Sure, because everybody knows that the only thing needed to ensure success on the field is if players are drafted at their appropriate draft round, right skinsdad?

Success on the field has literally NOTHING to do with things like: quality coaching, ample upgraded training facilities, franchise stability, owner interference, perpetual off the field issues, etc…

Didn’t say that chiller but sooner or later the talent has to show up and produce

 

[chillerdab]

That I definitey agree with.

They drafted well and they continue to draft well was my point, contrary to the whiners who dont like a player drafted in the exact round that they feel that player should be drafted.

They definitely have to produce now.

 

[skinsdad62]

And of course drafting people close to where they are rated enhances they ability to bring in more and better talent

The goal should be to draft top rated talent in the early rounds and bring in under drafted guys in the laters rounds . Guys called “ steals “

 

[skinsdad62]

That I definitey agree with.

They drafted well and they continue to draft well was my point, contrary to the whiners who dont like a player drafted in the exact round that they feel that player should be drafted.

They definitely have to produce now.

Davis was a good pick ? We haven’t drafted many star players early Haskins ? A good pick ?

 

[Buffalo_Nickel_1]

And of course drafting people close to where they are rated enhances they ability to bring in more and better talent

The goal should be to draft top rated talent in the early rounds and bring in under drafted guys in the laters rounds . Guys called “ steals “

I do think Media outlets have different boards then teams do .. I think Mayhew said that .. also luck comes in play also Jimmey Johnson on emmit smith .. We needed a RB how about this emmit guy from Florida Jimmy response we never talked him whatever pick him